Radius Ratio of Crystal: Interstitial vs Large Atom

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the radius ratio of interstitial versus large atoms in crystals, emphasizing that the differences depend significantly on the specific crystal and the types of atoms involved. Clarification is sought regarding the textbook definitions and the need for visual aids, such as diagrams, to better understand these concepts. The conversation highlights the importance of the repeating patterns in crystals and the concept of unit cells, which can be centered on any atom. It is noted that various types of unit cells exist, some of which are retained for historical reasons. Visual representations, particularly in three dimensions, are suggested as essential for grasping structural vectors.
asdf1
Messages
734
Reaction score
0
in the radius ratio of a crystal, what is the difference between the radius of the interstitial atom and large atom?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't you think that depends one heckuva lot on exactly what crystal you are talking about and what the atoms are?

Unless you are asking about the difference in meaning and I would think that would be obvious!
 
i guess so, but i saw that in a textbook about crystallography, and I'm not really clear on what's the difference... it'd be nice if that book could show those two things in a picture or diagram...
 
The bulk of a crystal is a repeating pattern,
so a "unit cell" can be centered on any atom.
There are many different types of "unit cells",
some retained for the sake of tradition.

Whenever the book describes structure vectors,
assemble a set of sticks in 3-d to show them.
Especially at first, 2-d drawings might not cut it.
 
ok, thanks!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top