Rate of precession caused by mountain on spherical earth

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the rate of precession caused by a mountain on a spherical Earth, with specific parameters provided such as the Earth's radius, mass of the Earth and mountain, and the distance of precession. The original poster attempts to understand how to calculate the angular velocity associated with this precession.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the concept of "free precession" and question whether the entire system should be treated as such. There are inquiries about relevant equations, particularly Euler's equations of motion for a rotating rigid body, and how to apply them to the problem. The original poster expresses confusion about finding the angular velocity needed for their calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on utilizing Euler's equations in the absence of external torques. The original poster has acknowledged their understanding of the equations but feels uncertain about their application in this context. The discussion is ongoing, with multiple interpretations being explored.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes that their professor does not provide direct help in lectures, relying instead on textbook readings, which may contribute to their confusion regarding the problem. There is mention of specific sections in the textbook that may contain relevant information.

student335
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



32eeB6W.png


R = 4000mi
phi = 60
Me = 5.972E24 kg
Mm = 5.972E16 kg
distance of procession = 100 mi

Homework Equations



I know the answer is supposed to be ~1010 years.

I also know what I am trying to do is have that e3 axis be pointing straight up, then when the mountain is placed on it, it "tips" down. So when the Earth continues spinning it know creates that little cone shape above the north pole. It will travel around this cone shape at a constant angular velocity. So when I determine that angular velocity I just divide the 100 miles by that distance. My question is how to find that angular velocity. I tried a few things, but I'm hopelessly stuck.

The Attempt at a Solution



FecuLdZ.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello and welcome to PF!

"Free precession" usually means precession in the absence of external torques. Are you sure you aren't supposed to treat the entire system (including the mountain) using equations for free precession.

The problem refers to section 10.8 of the text. Can you find any relevant information there? For example, have you covered Euler's equations of motion for a rotating rigid body?

It might help if you tell us what type and level of course this is from.
 
TSny said:
Hello and welcome to PF!

"Free precession" usually means precession in the absence of external torques. Are you sure you aren't supposed to treat the entire system (including the mountain) using equations for free precession.

The problem refers to section 10.8 of the text. Can you find any relevant information there? For example, have you covered Euler's equations of motion for a rotating rigid body?

It might help if you tell us what type and level of course this is from.

This is intermediate mechanics and yes we have "covered" up to section 10.8.

My professor just has us read the book and doesn't cover it in lecture, so I haven't gotten much help on this problem.

So I do understand Euler's equations, I just haven't read about them yet.I assume that the torque_1 and torque_2 values are zero and their respective change in angular velocity is also zero, so we only have to work with torque_3.

Torque_3 is calculated by R x F which is |R|F|sin(theta) which is RMgsin(theta)
 
Last edited:
The earth-plus-mountain object has no external torques applied to it. That's good news! You'll be able to use the Euler equations with no torques ("free precession").
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K