Engineering RC Circuit + Dependent Voltage Source

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on analyzing an RC circuit with a dependent voltage source and the behavior of an inductor when a switch is opened. The initial current through the inductor, iL(0-), is calculated using mesh analysis, resulting in a value of 32/14 amps. It is established that the inductor acts like a current source immediately after the switch is opened, maintaining the current at iL(0+) = iL(0-) = 1 A. The calculations for the currents through various resistors are discussed, leading to confusion about the consistency of results, particularly with the middle 2k resistor. Ultimately, the calculations are validated, confirming the initial conditions and steady-state behavior of the circuit.
DefaultName
Messages
179
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://img167.imageshack.us/img167/7747/picture2mg7.png

Homework Equations



iL(t) = current through inductor

Using The Step by Step Method:

Assume the solution iL(t) = K1 + K2*e^(-t/tau)
where K1 = iL(infinity) and K2 = iL(0+) - iL(infinity)

so, Assume the solution has the form:

iL(t) = iL(infinity) + [iL(0+) - iL(infinity]*e^(-t/tau)

Now, what I did was I calculated iL(0-) first... I replaced the inductor with a short circuit because we've assumed the SW has been held for a while.

So, we know that V1(t) = 6 V... I applied MESH ANALYSIS to the middle loop and to the right loop (both going clockwise) to find iL(0-).

Middle_Loop = 2A
Right_Loop = 2( iL(0-) - 2 ) + 12*iL(0-) = 30V... I get iL(0-) = 32/14 amps going CW

Is that right? If so, isn't it safe to assume that just after the switch is opened, for that one instant in time, the inductor will act like a current source since the current through an inductor CANNOT change instanteously.

So, I believe that you have to rewrite the circuit with the switch open and put a temporary current source in place of the inductor. After that, what do I do though? That's where I'm lost.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
DefaultName said:

Homework Statement



http://img167.imageshack.us/img167/7747/picture2mg7.png

Homework Equations



iL(t) = current through inductor

Using The Step by Step Method:

Assume the solution iL(t) = K1 + K2*e^(-t/tau)
where K1 = iL(infinity) and K2 = iL(0+) - iL(infinity)

so, Assume the solution has the form:

iL(t) = iL(infinity) + [iL(0+) - iL(infinity]*e^(-t/tau)

Now, what I did was I calculated iL(0-) first... I replaced the inductor with a short circuit because we've assumed the SW has been held for a while.

So, we know that V1(t) = 6 V... I applied MESH ANALYSIS to the middle loop and to the right loop (both going clockwise) to find iL(0-).

Middle_Loop = 2A
Right_Loop = 2( iL(0-) - 2 ) + 12*iL(0-) = 30V... I get iL(0-) = 32/14 amps going CW

Is that right? If so, isn't it safe to assume that just after the switch is opened, for that one instant in time, the inductor will act like a current source since the current through an inductor CANNOT change instanteously.

So, I believe that you have to rewrite the circuit with the switch open and put a temporary current source in place of the inductor. After that, what do I do though? That's where I'm lost.

The voltage on the 2 ohm resistor is V1. So, the voltage on the 12 ohm resistor is V1 + 5 V1 = 6 V1.
The current through this resistor is 6V1/12 = 0.5 V1.
The current through the 2 ohm resistor is V1/2 = 0.5 V1.
The sum of the 2 currents is 2 A. So, i_L(0^-) = 1 A
For T >0 there are 2 sources: the independent currnt source 2A and the controlled voltage source 5V1. The current i_L(0^+) = i_L(0^-) =1 Ais only an initial condition and is not taken in consideration in forming the differential equation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
But for the middle 2k resistor, I get 3Amps. and for the iL, I get 6V1/12 = 3 amps... how does this make sense?
 
DefaultName said:
But for the middle 2k resistor, I get 3Amps. and for the iL, I get 6V1/12 = 3 amps... how does this make sense?
It makes sense when the switch is closed.
i_L(0^-) = i_L(0^+) = 6A.
The calculation I made before is valid for i_L(infinity)
 
I got the ans, thx.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
12K
Replies
1
Views
827
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
647
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Back
Top