Reaction Rate and Activation Energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between the rates of disappearance of hydrogen gas and the appearance of methanol in the reaction CO + 2H2 → CH3OH. The correct relationship is that hydrogen gas disappears at twice the rate that methanol appears, leading to the conclusion that the answer is option c. In the second part, participants calculate the temperature at which the rate constant for the isomerization of cyclopropane to propene is 0.00447 1/sec, using the Arrhenius equation. There is some confusion regarding the signs in the equations, but the method for calculating the temperature is clarified, emphasizing the importance of stoichiometric ratios. The final answer for the temperature calculation is confirmed to be approximately 90.7 K.
Soaring Crane
Messages
461
Reaction score
0
1) Methanol can be produced by the following reaction:
CO (g) + 2H2 (g) --> CH30H (g)

How is the rate of disappearance of hydrogen gas related to the rate of appearance of methanol?
-delta

/delta t = ?

a. + delta

/delta t
b. + 1delta[CH3OH]/2delta t
c. + 2 delta [CH3OH]/delta t
d. none of the above

Is it d because the rates are supposed to be determined experimentally?


2) The first order isomerization of cyclopropane -> propene has a rate constant of 0.00026 1/sec at 435 Celsius with an activation energy of 264 kJ/mol. What is the temperature at which the rate constant is 0.00447 1/sec? Calculate your answer in kelvins.

k2 = 0.00447 1/s
k1 = 0.00026 1/s
T1 = 435 C = 708.15 K
E_a = 264 kJ/mol = 2640 J/mol

ln (k2/k1) = (-E_a/R)*[(1-T2) - (1/T1)]?

1/T2 = [-ln (k2/k1)/(-E_a/R)] + (1/T1)
1/T2 = -ln(0.00447/.00026)/[-2640 J/mol/(8.314)] + (1/708.15 K)
=0.0096133567 + (1/708.15 K) = 0.011025

1/0.011025 = 90.69 K = 90.7 K?

Is the correct final answer and method?

Thank you.

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
number 1:
no, it has to do with the mole ratios.

number 2:
the equation should be:
ln(\frac{K_1}{K_2}) = \frac {E_a}{R} (\frac{1}{T_2}- \frac{1}{T_1})
 
Last edited:
1. So the rates are determined stoichiometrically? (I thought this was wrong.) The answer then would be b.??

2. ln (k2/k1) = (-E_a/R)*[(1-T2) - (1/T1)] I got this equation in my text. Why is the ratio of k's switched? (The - on the E_a/R will cancel out in solving for T2.)


Thanks.
 
Last edited:
1. no, hydrogen gas disappears at twice the rate

2. I'm sorry, I didn't notice the negative sign that you put in front of E_a
 
Last edited:
I'm pretty sure that

- \frac{d[H_2]}{2dt}= \frac{d[CH3OH]}{dt}

opposite signs just in case the latex isn't showing up
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top