Reading a Force vs Time graph to get distance?

AI Thread Summary
To determine the distance traveled by a 3.5-kg block over 11 seconds using a force vs. time graph, the net force is first used to calculate acceleration via F=ma, yielding an acceleration of 1.14 m/s². The initial velocity is 0 m/s, but the challenge arises in finding the final velocity for subsequent calculations. The discussion emphasizes the importance of updating the initial velocity with each segment of the motion, as the block experiences different accelerations over time. The correct approach involves applying the kinematic equation x = (1/2)*a*t² + Vi*t + Xi for each time interval, ensuring that the final velocity from one segment becomes the initial velocity for the next. Accurate calculations are crucial for obtaining the correct total distance traveled.
ceziacrowe
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The net force exerted on a 3.5-kg block is shown in the figure as a function of time. How far does the block travel in the first 11.0 s? Assume that the motion is one dimensional and that the velocity of the block at time t= 0 s is 0 m/s.

Homework Equations


Vf^2 = Vi^2 + 2ad
F=ma


The Attempt at a Solution


I figured that I could use the force on the graph so I used F=ma. Using the first point of the graph, I got 4 N = (3.5 kg)a, solved for a and got 1.14 m/s^2. Since I'm trying to find distance, I tried using Vf^2 = Vi^2 + 2ad but here's where I got stuck. Initial velocity would be 0 m/s but for final velocity, I'm not sure where I would get that number from. Am I headed in the right direction with this problem?

Also, this type of graph is kind of confusing to read for me. If the y-axis in this problem was labeled acceleration (ax) instead of F(N), a straight horizontal line from 0 to 2 seconds would be constant acceleration then from 2 to 6 seconds, it would be zero acceleration?

Any help would be amazing and immensely appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • prob01av10.gif
    prob01av10.gif
    10.8 KB · Views: 1,086
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Use this equation: x = (1/2)*a*t^2 +Vi*t + Xi

And, a horizontal line is constant acceleration, A line horizontal at Zero is zero acceleration.
 
Texag said:
Use this equation: x = (1/2)*a*t^2 +Vi*t + Xi

And, a horizontal line is constant acceleration, A line horizontal at Zero is zero acceleration.

So I calculated each part and it's still coming out as an incorrect answer.

For 0-2 s, x=(1/2)(1.14 m/s^2)(2^2 s) + 0 m/s + 0.
I did the same thing (finding a then plugging it into that equation) until the 11.0 s mark on the graph but the answer was incorrect.

I also put for Xi the total amount of X calculated so far but I got the same answer of 10.838 m.
 
Last edited:
You have to be sure to change the initial velocity each time you calculate. For example, when finding the displacement of the second portion, It is not zero, but the final velocity of the one you calculated above.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top