Really weird application of Lenz's Law ()

jdstokes
Messages
520
Reaction score
1
Two loops, A and B, are aligned parallel to each other. There is a current in loop A, which induces a current in loop B. How does the current in loop A change with time?

By Lenz's Law, the current in loop B creates a magnetic field which opposes the change in magnetic flux which created it, in other words, it opposes the increase of A's magnetic field. This much makes sense. But apparently this also implies that the change in A's field must reduce the magnetic field of B. So A's field increases with time.

I cannot understand why the change in A's field must reduce B's field. What law is being employed here, and why does it follow from the fact that B opposes the change in A?

Thanks.

James
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If loop A has a changing current then the flux through loop B is changing. This changing flux creates an electric field which drives a current in B. But this current in B produces a new field which is also changing so A is now experiencing a changing field as well. In fact, the changing current in A already affects A even without the B loop (this is called self inductance). So an extra current in A develops that tries to resist the change in flux due to the new current in B. You should try to convince yourself that this current will add (rather than subtract) to the current already present in A because the B loop will tend to make the magnetic field passing through the A loop smaller (just get your current directions right and use the right hand rule).
 
Thankyou so much!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top