Rectangular finite potential well problem

fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,928
Reaction score
272

Homework Statement


An electron enters in a finite rectangular potential well of length 4 angstroms. When the entering electrons have a kinetic energy of 0.7 eV they can travel through the region without having any reflection. Use this information to calculate the depth of the potential well.


Homework Equations


Not sure because I don't know if the kinetic energy of the electron is greater or lesser than the potential well.
I know that inside the well, \Psi _{II}(x)= C \sin (kx)+ D \cos (kx). I also know the form of the wave function outside the well (thanks to https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=540406&page=3) but I don't have the normalization, etc. I tried to search in google, wikipedia and hyperphysics and can't find the whole detailed solution.
I was thinking of calculating the flux of probability (I need the exact wavefunctions, normalized) in order to calculate the coefficient of transmission.

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm confused. I don't know how to tackle the problem, too many unknowns to me.
Any tip is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ah I think I just realized how to solve the problem.
The electron has a greater kinetic energy that the potential well.
The coefficient of transmission is the one given by a barrier of potential when the energy of the particle exceed the potential barrier.
It is worth T=\frac{1}{1+ \frac{V_0 ^2 \sin ^2 (k_1 a)}{4E(E-V_0)}} where k_1 = \sqrt { \frac{2m(V_0-E)}{\hbar ^2}}. But unfortunately k_1 is complex.
So I set T=1 and I try to solve for V_0... but this doesn't go well. This gives me V_0=0.
By the way I used the formula given in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rectangular_potential_barrier#Analysis_of_the_obtained_expressions.
Does someone understand better than me what's going on?
 
Hmm, I've watched the first part of and he reaches a slightly different result than wikipedia for the transmission coefficient.
His k_1 is worth \sqrt {\frac{2m (E-V_0)}{\hbar ^2} }.
So for my exercise, I must solve for V_0 and n=1 in the expression a \sqrt {\frac{2m (E-V_0)}{\hbar ^2}}=n \pi. I've checked out the units, all seems to work.
When I plug and chug the given values for the problem, I reach that V_0\approx -1.65 eV or -1.6 eV if I round correctly.
Can someone check out my work? That would after all make wikipedia "slightly wrong" for a formula.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top