Reflection of spherical wave from plane

AI Thread Summary
A spherical wave originating from a point source reflects off a planar surface, prompting the need for a ray diagram and wavefront sketches. While sketching wavefronts is straightforward, creating a ray diagram poses challenges for those only familiar with mirror reflections. The Law of Reflection is essential for accurately depicting the behavior of the rays as they interact with the planar surface. Understanding that rays diverge from the source and converge at the point of reflection is crucial. This discussion emphasizes the importance of applying fundamental principles of wave behavior in reflection scenarios.
ThetaPi
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Problem statement.

A spherical wave (from a point source) reflects from a planar surface. Draw a ray diagram and sketch some wavefronts for the reflected wave.

Attempt

It is easy to sketch some wavefronts for the reflected waves; however, how is it possible to draw a ray diagram for this? I have only done ray diagrams for reflections from mirrors into a person's eyes.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The same as for the eye case only that this time the rays converge at their source and diverge ( do not take these words literally) away. Use a point source on a peace of paper draw rays around it than place a line which represents the planar surface. The rest is quite intuitive.
 
ThetaPi said:
Problem statement.

A spherical wave (from a point source) reflects from a planar surface. Draw a ray diagram and sketch some wavefronts for the reflected wave.

Attempt

It is easy to sketch some wavefronts for the reflected waves; however, how is it possible to draw a ray diagram for this? I have only done ray diagrams for reflections from mirrors into a person's eyes.

Welcome to PF :smile:

Look up the Law of Reflection, that is the key here.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top