Refraction (magnification) - very basic

AI Thread Summary
A lens creates a real image that is twice the size of the object and located 15 cm from the lens. The magnification (m) is determined to be -2 due to the inversion of real images. This leads to the object distance (p) being calculated as positive when applying the correct sign conventions. The confusion arose from forgetting these conventions in optics formulas. Understanding these principles resolves the initial misunderstanding regarding the object's distance.
FrogPad
Messages
801
Reaction score
0
Question:

A lens produces a real image that is twice as large as the object and is located 15 cm from the lens. Find (a) the object distance and (b) the focal length of the
lens.

m = \frac{-i}{p}

So the image is twice as large so obviously m = 2. The lens produces a real image that is 15cm from the lens. Thus, i > 0 RIGHT? So we are simply left with,

p = \frac{-15cm}{2}. How can p (the objects distance) be negative? This doesn't make any sense to me. I can resolve this physically but not in the math... I would like to know why.

This problem should be trivial.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The issue here is that there are bunch of easy-to-forget sign conventions that go along with the optics formulas. In particular: we are dealing here with a REAL image. Real images are ALWAYS inverted. Because the real image is inverted, it's magnification is technically -2, not +2. This will solve your sign problem and make the object distance positive.
 
Thanks :)

I figured it would be something simple like that. Much appreciated.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top