Relate simple harmonic motion to circular motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the maximum speed of a mass on a spring is given by Vmax = 2πfA, where f is frequency and A is amplitude. Participants explore the relationships between simple harmonic motion and circular motion, using equations like T = 2πr/V and T = 2πA/V. There is a debate on whether calculus is necessary for deriving the velocity function from displacement, with some suggesting that it is not required. The importance of understanding the physical concepts behind the equations is emphasized, rather than relying solely on memorized formulas. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the connection between mathematical derivations and physical interpretations in the context of harmonic motion.
peanut15
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
1. Prove that the maximum speed of a mass on a spring is given by Vmax = 2pifA
f = frequency A= amplitude


We have just learned how to relate simple harmonic motion to circular motion. So I am dealing with some of those equations.

3. While writing this out I kind of had a thought and think I got it, but am still not sure.

T=2pir/V is one of the equations that we are shown.
we are also shown that A=r because of the radius being a circles maximum amplitude. so
T=2piA/V
V=2piA/T and T=1/f right?
so
V=2pifA ?

Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
peanut15 said:
1. Prove that the maximum speed of a mass on a spring is given by Vmax = 2pifA
f = frequency A= amplitude


We have just learned how to relate simple harmonic motion to circular motion. So I am dealing with some of those equations.

3. While writing this out I kind of had a thought and think I got it, but am still not sure.

T=2pir/V is one of the equations that we are shown.
we are also shown that A=r because of the radius being a circles maximum amplitude. so
T=2piA/V
V=2piA/T and T=1/f right?
so
V=2pifA ?

Is this correct?

Welcome to the PF. I didn't follow what you wrote... Have you had beginning calculus yet? If so, write an equation for the displacement of the mass as a funtion of tiime. It will have an oscillatory term with a sin() or cos() in it (your choice). If that is the equation for the displacement, how can you use calculus to find the equation for the velocity as a function of time? That will show you how to get the answer they are asking about.
 
berkeman said:
Welcome to the PF. I didn't follow what you wrote... Have you had beginning calculus yet? If so, write an equation for the displacement of the mass as a funtion of tiime. It will have an oscillatory term with a sin() or cos() in it (your choice). If that is the equation for the displacement, how can you use calculus to find the equation for the velocity as a function of time? That will show you how to get the answer they are asking about.
They would have talked about calculus if I had to use it to do a proof of this. I don't think it is required and there are no trig functions at all. I have taken calculus and would be looking for a solution that way, but they would usually demonstrate something mathmatical like that before asking us to use it in a solution.

I could list out all the equations they give on the page before that should be used to solve this question. They were all about relation simple harmonic motion to circular motion. Which would be where the 2pi comes from into the simple harmonic motion of the spring.
 
peanut15 said:
They would have talked about calculus if I had to use it to do a proof of this. I don't think it is required and there are no trig functions at all. I have taken calculus and would be looking for a solution that way, but they would usually demonstrate something mathmatical like that before asking us to use it in a solution.

I could list out all the equations they give on the page before that should be used to solve this question. They were all about relation simple harmonic motion to circular motion. Which would be where the 2pi comes from into the simple harmonic motion of the spring.

I was trying to get you to think about what is really going on physically, not about what canned equations they may have listed for you.

Can you write the equation for the x displacement of the mass? You are correct that the mass moves in simple harmonic motion. That is where the sin() or cos() funtion comes in. You don't need the circle analogy at all, just write the equation for x(t), and use simple differential calculus to find v(t). Very simple and physical way to show what they are asking for.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top