Related Rates: Calculating the Speed of a Moving Shadow

momogiri
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Question
A street light is mounted at the top of a 15 foot tall pole. A man 6 ft tall walks away from the pole with a speed of 6 ft/s along a straight path. How fast is the tip of his shadow moving when he is 40 ft from the pole?

Attempt
Well actually, I've drawn it out and stuff, but I was wondering if the tip of shadow would be moving in the same speed as the man..
I'm a bit confused at how to tackle this problem.. :/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Draw up some triangles, and remember to use Pythagoras.
 
Yeah, I drew up my triangle within a triangle, it's attached, so..

The change in speed of the shadow is not the same as the speed of the man, right?
And 40 ft refers to the distance between the pole and the man right? Not between the shadow tip and the pole?
 

Attachments

  • tri.JPG
    tri.JPG
    1.3 KB · Views: 448
Yes, the problem says "when he is 40 ft from the pole".

But you don't need Pythagoras since the length of the hypotenuse is not relevant. Use "similar triangles".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
But you don't need Pythagoras since the length of the hypotnuse is not relevant.

I was thinking of something else :( Sorry
 
Ok, so I tried to do it with similar triangles..

With my image that I attached earlier, I had the similar trigangles
y/6
and
(x+y)/15

(y being the distance of the shadow and the man
x being distance from man and pole)

So \frac{y}{6} = \frac{x+y}{15}
and I solved for x
15y = 6x+6y
9y = 6x
x = \frac{3}{2}y
and took derivatives of both sides wrt t
dx/dt = \frac{3}{2}dy/dt
And since the change in x is 6ft/sec
I just plugged in the numbers and found dy/dt to be 4
But it's wrong.

It's probably because I didn't incorporate 40ft as x somewhere, but I'm looking at what I did, and I just don't know what I should do :/
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top