Relating Motor Torque to Vehicle Motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on relating electrical motor torque to the motion of a vehicle, specifically an RC car, using Newton's Laws. It outlines the forces acting on the vehicle, including gravitational, normal, rolling resistance, and the torque from the motor. The challenge arises in constructing a free body diagram (FBD) for the car's wheel, particularly in accounting for rolling resistance and friction when rolling without slipping. The conversation also questions how to model friction forces if the wheel is rolling with slipping, highlighting the complexities of analyzing torque and motion in these scenarios. Overall, the thread emphasizes the need for a clear understanding of the relationship between motor torque and vehicle dynamics.
hp-p00nst3r
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
This is more of a curiosity question rather than a homework question, and it has to do with how to relate the electrical motor torque to a vehicle's motion using Newton's Laws.

Now for a vehicle (say RC car) moving forward in a straight line, the forces that are acting on it are the gravitational and normal forces, along with the rolling resistance and the force applied due to the rotation of the electrical motor.

I can easily write the equation of motion here in this case where it's just the
applied force - friction force = mass * accel

However, another problem arises when I construct an FBD for the car's wheel. In the case for rolling without slipping, it is the friction force that causes the wheel to roll forward, but when rolling resistance is not negligible, I am not sure how that is shown on the FBD. There is also the motor torque now present in the problem.

All I'm trying to do is relate the motor's torque to the applied force of the vehicle, and the approach I've taken is with the use of Newton's Equations of Motion.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I understand you correctly, you are trying to account for the friction the wheel experiences as it spins around the car's axle. In which case, this is simply the torque produced by the friction in the opposite direction of the torque applied by the motor.
 
What about if the wheel was rolling WITH slipping? How would the friction force in the slip be modeled in the FBD? I'm not even sure if that is even a reasonable assumption. Pretty much everything that I've learned about rotating bodies in terms of friction has had to do with rolling with slip.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top