Relating Optical Depth and Extinction (τ(λ) and A(λ))

Mike89
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hey guys sorry my first post is a help request and not an introduction or anything but I'd really appreciate a helping hand here

Homework Statement



Show that the extinction A(λ) and optical depth τ(λ) are related by the linear relationship A(λ)=1.086*τ(λ)

Homework Equations



m(λ)=M(λ) + 5Log(d)-5 + A(λ)
which I'd rearrage to
m(λ)-M(λ)-5Log(d)+5=A(λ)

Here in lies the problem, I have all the equations I can find in my notes and the slides but nothing that relates τ(λ) to anything other than:

exp(-τ) = (I/I0) (sorry wasn't sure how to subscript the 0 in I0)

and then nothing to relate intensities to magnitudes.

The Attempt at a Solution



I thought maybe I could use 2 stars where I new the apparent and absolute magnitudes ( the sun and vega, etc) and the distance obviously and then calculate how τ(λ) and A(λ) are related and show the 1.086 multiplier in both but I can't work out how to relate A(λ) to anything involving intensity.


I hope you guys can help me out here since I'm stumped :) thanks for anything you can
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start with the definition of a difference in apparent magnitudes. . .

m_1 - m_2 = 2.5log(I_1/I_2)

extinction, A is defined as A = m^{'} - m

Now, how are I_1, I_2, and tau related. . .
 
AstroRoyale said:
m_1 - m_2 = 2.5log(I_1/I_2)

Souldn't it be m_1 - m_2 = 2.5log(I_2/I_1) ?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top