Relation b/w probability of triplet state and singlet state

wishfulthinking
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[/B]
If electron (1) is in a state described by cosα1χ+ + sinα1e iβ1 χ- and electron (2) is in a state described by cosα2χ+ + sinα2e iβ2 χ-, what is the probability that the two-electron state is in a triplet state?

The Attempt at a Solution


I already solved this problem; I have a conceptual question about solving it using a relation that would make my solution a lot simpler. I read somewhere online that the probability of finding the electron system in the triplet state can be equated to (1 - the probability of finding the electron system in the singlet state). I was wondering how this is possible. Thanks for any input.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The space consisting of two angular momenta each equal to ##1/2## is a 4 dimensional space - it is spanned by 4 basis vectors. 3 of them belongs to the triplet state and the last one belongs to the singlet state. The point here is that, for two ##1/2## angular momenta, there can only be triplet or singlet. That's why the probability of finding triplet states is equal to unity minus the probability of finding a singlet state.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top