Relation between commutator, unitary matrix, and hermitian exponential operator

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on demonstrating that a unitary matrix U can be expressed as U=exp(iC), where C is a hermitian operator. It emphasizes the need to show that if U is represented as A+iB, then A and B must commute, and suggests expressing these matrices in terms of C. Participants express confusion regarding the application of the exponential term and the Taylor expansion in relation to the matrices A and B. A suggestion is made to diagonalize U as a potential approach to solving the problem. The conversation highlights the complexities involved in manipulating the commutator and matrix terms.
silverdiesel
Messages
64
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that one can write U=exp(iC), where U is a unitary matrix, and C is a hermitian operator. If U=A+iB, show that A and B commute. Express these matrices in terms of C. Assum exp(M) = 1+M+M^2/2!...

Homework Equations


U=exp(iC)
C=C*
U*U=I
U=A+iB
exp(M) = sum over n: ((M)^n)/n!

The Attempt at a Solution


I am really stumped. I tried (A+iB)(A*-iB*)=I, and I can get the commutator to come out of that, but I have these A*A and B*B terms which I am unsure how to use. I am also not using the exponential term in any way. I know it has something to do with the taylor expansion, just not sure how to get A+iB into that expansion.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember that A and B are real matrices. For the first question, try diagonalizing U first.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top