Relation of fine structure constant to splitting of spectral li

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on estimating the fine structure splitting in the H-α line and justifying the calculations involved. The fine structure constant, α², is used to relate energy changes to frequency, with the participant noting that applying the Rydberg formula yields a wavelength of approximately 656 nm and an energy of about 1.9 eV. There is confusion regarding the origin of the 242 THz figure mentioned in the solution sheet, which is crucial for understanding the frequency change. The participant also explores the possibility of deriving the magnetic field experienced by an electron to achieve similar results but finds their attempts complicated. The conversation emphasizes the need for clearer derivations and justifications for the calculations presented.
Emspak
Messages
240
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Estimate the magnitude of the fine structure splitting in H-α in THz

Homework Equations



Rydberg -- R_y \left(\frac{1}{n_f^2}-\frac{1}{n_i^2}\right) = \Delta E

The Attempt at a Solution



This isn't really a request for solution help, and more a justification. I know that if I apply the above equation I get (-13.6eV) (5/36)~ 1.9 eV and from there I get a wavelength (~656 nm). So far so good. I also know that the fine structure constant α2 multiplied by that will give me a change in frequency. That is the splution sheet says "~α2 (1.9eV) " and proceeds to say that if you multiply the reciprocal of that by 242 THz you get 6.8 GHz.

Well an good, but I am trying to justify this better. I know that 656nm ~ 1.9 GHz. I just want to figure out how to make the step. That is, it seems right, but if someone said "Hey this is the equation they are using" that would help.

I also ask this because it seemed to me that if one could derive the magnetic field experienced by an electron as it runs around the nucleus one could get the same result. Bu my attempts to do so so far have met with little success-- I feel like I am perhaps overcomplicating things. (I tried starting with the old equation for B field in a current loop and going from there, using the Bohr radius, but I ended up with stuff that stopped making sense).

Anyhow, to recap: first, justify the answer, second, is there a link to a derivation or something that I am missing.

THanks folks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The fine structure of the Hydrogen atom arises due to three effects, the kinetic energy effect, spin-orbit coupling (basically what you're thinking about with regards to the magnetic field), and the Darwinian term. Summing the three effects gives you the ~##\alpha^2## dependence of the energy splitting.

See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine_structure
 
thanks, i knew of the wiki page, the issue is that in the answer sheet to the test this appeared on I am jut tryng to figure out where the 242 came from. It's like it comes out of nowhere.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top