Relationship between angle gamma and alpha and beta

Demon117
Messages
162
Reaction score
1
So I feel like a complete moron for asking this. I have never been very strong in geometry so I wondered if a few math folks could help me out. I am just looking for the angle relationships of gamma, alpha, and beta. This is just a small piece of a much larger analysis that I am doing.

I know that beta and gamma are related by \gamma=\beta - \frac{\pi}{2}, so if someone could push me in the right direction in determining the relationship between gamma and alpha. Thanks in advance.
 

Attachments

  • Scan.jpeg
    Scan.jpeg
    7.6 KB · Views: 780
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Unless you excluded some condition, there is no relation between alpha and the other two. Any two right triangles could be composed like this.
 
hamsterman said:
Unless you excluded some condition, there is no relation between alpha and the other two. Any two right triangles could be composed like this.

So you are telling me that I cannot describe the angle gamma in terms of its deviation from the horizontal plane? The plane on which the large triangle sits?
 
Take the point where the small triangle meets the big one (at angle gamma) and rotate the leg of the small triangle so that the location of angle gamma changes. You get different values of gamma without changing the value of alpha. So gamma cannot be solved in terms of alpha alone.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top