Relationship between heat and resistivity of a wire

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the resistance of a metal wire at -20 degrees Celsius, given its resistance at 20 degrees Celsius (10 ohms) and at 90 degrees Celsius (10.55 ohms). The user seeks guidance on the relationship between temperature and electrical resistivity, specifically using the linear approximation formula R = Ro + c(ΔT). They derive the constant c as 0.0078 Ω/C and apply it to find the resistance at -20 degrees Celsius, resulting in approximately 9.68 ohms. The calculations are confirmed to align with expectations, reflecting the relationship between temperature changes and resistivity. The user also shares insights on formatting equations for clarity in the forum.
sollinton
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



"A metal wire has a resistance of 10 ohms at a temperature of 20 degrees C. If the same wire has a resistance of 10.55 ohms at 90 degrees C, what is the resistance of this same wire when its temperature is -20 degrees C?"


Homework Equations



I am not exactly having trouble solving this problem. It's just that my teacher realized after she wrote the problem that she never taught us the relationship between heat and electrical resistivity. Therefore she gave us the problem as extra credit and told us to find out how to solve it on our own.

So all I am really looking for is an equation. I would like to do the calculations myself, but if someone could point me in the right direction, it would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This temperature dependence of resistance seems to be quite complicated, but I think all you want in this case is the simplest approximation. In Wikipedia "Electrical Resistance" it says "Near room temperature, the electric resistance of a typical metal increases linearly with rising temperature". In other words R = Ro + c(delta T), where Ro is the resistance at room temperature, c is a constant and delta T is the temperature minus room temperature.
 
Okay, so using your equation

R = R_{o} + c(\Delta T)​

I solved for c

c = \frac{(R - Ro)}{\Delta T}

c = \frac{(10.55 \Omega - 10 \Omega)}{70 C}​

And found c to equal

0.0078 \frac{\Omega}{C}​

Then plugging c back into the original equation and using the new \DeltaT:

R = 10\Omega + 0.0078 \frac{\Omega}{C}(-40C)
R = 9.68 \Omega​

This seems to make perfect sense, as 9.68 is about as far from 10 as 10.55 is, and the smaller change in temperature accounts for the smaller change in resistivity.

Thank you very much for your help!

P.S.
Sorry the equations are kind of sloppy, I don't have that program that puts out the symbols and such.

**EDIT**
Woo got the fancy equations working!
 
Last edited:
Looks good!
People are making these equations by putting "tex" before and "/tex" after, using square brackets instead of quotes. Then the website will translate cryptic commands - like "\theta" into the Greek letter theta. If you hold your mouse over a fancy formula you can see how it was done. Unfortunately it is quite a bit of work and you can't see what you are doing as you do it.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top