Relationship between magnetic field lines and magnetic field

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mathematical demonstration that the density of magnetic field lines is directly proportional to the magnitude of the magnetic field (B). Participants emphasize the use of Gauss' law, specifically the equation ## \nabla \cdot B=0 ##, to illustrate that the number of flux lines entering a volume equals the number exiting, thereby reinforcing the conservation of magnetic flux. The conversation also touches on the limitations of two-dimensional representations in accurately depicting the inverse square law of magnetic fields and the necessity of a three-dimensional model for proper understanding.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss' Law in electromagnetism
  • Familiarity with vector fields and field line concepts
  • Knowledge of magnetic flux and its mathematical representation
  • Basic grasp of three-dimensional modeling in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical implications of Gauss' Law in magnetic fields
  • Explore the concept of magnetic flux density and its calculation
  • Learn about three-dimensional vector field representations
  • Investigate the relationship between magnetic field strength and field line density
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and researchers interested in electromagnetism, particularly those focusing on magnetic field theory and its mathematical foundations.

a1234
Messages
78
Reaction score
6
Homework Statement
Show that the density of magnetic field lines can be used as a measure of the size of the magnetic field.
Relevant Equations
psi = BAcos(theta)
As stated in the problem, I want to demonstrate mathematically that field line density is directly related to the magnitude of B. How would I be able to do this, other than simply using the flux equation and showing that for a higher flux in the same area, the magnetic field must be rise accordingly. Or would this be sufficient?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The density of flux lines in 3 dimensions is proportional to the magnetic field strength. Drawings that are two dimensional don't show the inverse square law properly that occurs from a magnetic pole, etc. I would need to think about exactly why a 3 dimensional model gives exactly what is needed for the conservation of flux, etc, but in any case it does.

Edit: I think it probably can be demonstrated by saying that the flux lines into any box are the same as the flux lines out of the box=if they go in, they must emerge, and by Gauss' law, they then obey ## \nabla \cdot B=0 ##, just like the magnetic field, but maybe someone else can comment on this.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff
Charles Link said:
Edit: I think it probably can be demonstrated by saying that the flux lines into any box are the same as the flux lines out of the box=if they go in, they must emerge, and by Gauss' law, they then obey ## \nabla \cdot B=0 ##, just like the magnetic field, but maybe someone else can comment on this.
How can we show that the individual field lines obey Gauss' law? How would this be different from showing that Gauss' law is satisfied for the field?
 
a1234 said:
As stated in the problem, I want to demonstrate mathematically that field line density is directly related to the magnitude of B. How would I be able to do this, other than simply using the flux equation and showing that for a higher flux in the same area, the magnetic field must be rise accordingly. Or would this be sufficient?
It may help to start with the definition of a vector field line. If parametric curve ##\vec x(s)## is a field line, it obeys
$$\vec x'(s) = \vec B(\vec x).$$ Perhaps someone else can explain how to define field line density mathematically.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
I learnt physics using the centimetre-gram-second (cgs) system of units, where Gauss specified that 4 pi lines of force originate from a unit magnetic pole, and the magnetic flux density is expressed in lines per cm2. So I find it hard to put my heart into the question!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
641
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
821
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K