Relationship of temperature and radius.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between temperature and radius in main sequence stars transitioning to supergiants. Initially, a star with a surface temperature of 25,000 K and a radius 10 times that of the Sun drops to 5,000 K. Using the Stefan-Boltzmann Law, participants calculate the new radius, concluding that if luminosity remains constant, the radius increases significantly, with one participant arriving at an answer of 250 solar radii. The use of Morgan-Keenan spectral classification is confirmed to be applicable beyond just main sequence stars.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Stefan-Boltzmann Law (L=4πR²σT⁴)
  • Familiarity with Morgan-Keenan spectral classification
  • Knowledge of luminosity and its relationship with temperature and radius
  • Basic concepts of stellar evolution and phases
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of the Stefan-Boltzmann Law in stellar astrophysics
  • Study the Morgan-Keenan spectral classification system in detail
  • Explore the relationship between luminosity, temperature, and radius in different stellar phases
  • Investigate the implications of energy conservation in stellar evolution
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy students, astrophysicists, and educators interested in stellar evolution and the physical principles governing star behavior.

darkar
Messages
187
Reaction score
0
Here's the question,

Initially, a main sequence star has a surface temperature of 25000 K and a radius 10 times that of the sun. Its temperature drop to 5000 K as it becomes a supergiant. What is its radius in term of solar radii?
a) 25
b) 50
c) 100
d) 250
e) 500

Well, I tried to do it using luminosity , L=4πR²σT⁴. Since the luminosity is not given, i use the Morgan-Keenan spectral classification to get the luminosity of the star at each phase, that's is at temperature of 25000 K has luminosity of 20,000 and for 5000 K has luminosity of 0.4. I got my final answer as 1.18 solar radius, which mean my answer is wrong. How should i approach the problem? and is that the spectral classification is only for main star sequence? and my friend use the relationship of temperature^4 is inversely proportional to 1/(radius)^2 and he got the answer for 250. BUt doesn't that mean that the luminosity is the same, is this true?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the total energy output is considered the same, then one can establish an equivalence, much like your friend did.

r12*T14 = r22*T24

or r1*T12 = r2*T22

or r2 = r1*(T1/T2)2

So what does this say about the luminosities?
 
I see... so the luminosities in that two phases are the same.

Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
906
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K