Relativistic and non-relativisitic kinetic energy

lola2000
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


at what speed does the expression for relativistic kinetic energy vary from the non-relativistic expression by 5%?


Homework Equations


Relativistic kinetic energy K=(gamma-1)mc^2
Non-relativistic kinetic energy K=0.5mv^2


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not sure how to attempt this!
Should I be finding the difference? ie K(relativistic)-K(non-relativistic)=0.05??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi lola2000, welcome to PF!:smile:

lola2000 said:
Should I be finding the difference? ie K(relativistic)-K(non-relativistic)=0.05??

Close, you should be finding the relative difference |Krel-Knon-rel|/Knon-rel=0.05 ... make sense?
 
I see, that makes sense.

But when I do this I get
0.05 = [(gamma-1)mc^2 - 0.5mc^2] / 0.5mv^2
which simplifies to
0.6mv^2 = (gamma-1)mc^2
0.6v^2/c^2 +1 = gamma

which is really nasty to solve! Is there a trick I have missed?
 
lola2000 said:
I see, that makes sense.

But when I do this I get
0.05 = [(gamma-1)mc^2 - 0.5mc^2[/color]] / 0.5mv^2

I assume this is a typo?

which simplifies to
0.6mv^2 = (gamma-1)mc^2

Really?
 
You are right!
That was a typo - it should have been -0.5mv^2

But I am still stuck with the algebra

I have 0.525v^2/c^2 = gamma - 1

How do I rearrange this??

It is not simplifying!
 
lola2000 said:
You are right!
That was a typo - it should have been -0.5mv^2

But I am still stuck with the algebra

I have 0.525v^2/c^2 = gamma - 1

How do I rearrange this??

It is not simplifying!

I did not check the previous steps so I cannot guarantee this is the correct equation. But assuming it is, you just need to add 1 to both sides (to have gamma isolated). Then square both sides and rename v^2/c^2 = X . Then you will have a quadratic equation for X. Solve, keep only the positive root. That will be v^2/c^2. Then the answer is the square root of X.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top