Relativistic and non-relativisitic kinetic energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the speed at which relativistic kinetic energy diverges from the non-relativistic expression by 5%. Participants clarify that the correct approach involves calculating the relative difference between the two kinetic energy equations. A participant encounters algebraic challenges while simplifying the equation derived from the relative difference. They are advised to isolate the gamma factor and convert the equation into a quadratic form for easier solving. The conversation emphasizes the importance of careful algebraic manipulation to find the correct speed.
lola2000
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


at what speed does the expression for relativistic kinetic energy vary from the non-relativistic expression by 5%?


Homework Equations


Relativistic kinetic energy K=(gamma-1)mc^2
Non-relativistic kinetic energy K=0.5mv^2


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not sure how to attempt this!
Should I be finding the difference? ie K(relativistic)-K(non-relativistic)=0.05??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi lola2000, welcome to PF!:smile:

lola2000 said:
Should I be finding the difference? ie K(relativistic)-K(non-relativistic)=0.05??

Close, you should be finding the relative difference |Krel-Knon-rel|/Knon-rel=0.05 ... make sense?
 
I see, that makes sense.

But when I do this I get
0.05 = [(gamma-1)mc^2 - 0.5mc^2] / 0.5mv^2
which simplifies to
0.6mv^2 = (gamma-1)mc^2
0.6v^2/c^2 +1 = gamma

which is really nasty to solve! Is there a trick I have missed?
 
lola2000 said:
I see, that makes sense.

But when I do this I get
0.05 = [(gamma-1)mc^2 - 0.5mc^2[/color]] / 0.5mv^2

I assume this is a typo?

which simplifies to
0.6mv^2 = (gamma-1)mc^2

Really?
 
You are right!
That was a typo - it should have been -0.5mv^2

But I am still stuck with the algebra

I have 0.525v^2/c^2 = gamma - 1

How do I rearrange this??

It is not simplifying!
 
lola2000 said:
You are right!
That was a typo - it should have been -0.5mv^2

But I am still stuck with the algebra

I have 0.525v^2/c^2 = gamma - 1

How do I rearrange this??

It is not simplifying!

I did not check the previous steps so I cannot guarantee this is the correct equation. But assuming it is, you just need to add 1 to both sides (to have gamma isolated). Then square both sides and rename v^2/c^2 = X . Then you will have a quadratic equation for X. Solve, keep only the positive root. That will be v^2/c^2. Then the answer is the square root of X.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top