Relativistic CM frame Kinetic energy

Bigfoots mum
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Now then, this is a past paper question for only 3 marks but its annoying me.

2 identical spheres undergoing an elastic relativistic collision. The spheres move with a speed such that their CM frame kinetic energy is equal to their rest energy. Calculate the speed the spheres in the CM frame.
Not entirely sure about this, i took the obvious option and calculated (root3/2)c as my speed.

Any ideas?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Bigfoots mum! :smile:

(have a square-root: √ :wink:)
Bigfoots mum said:
… Not entirely sure about this, i took the obvious option and calculated (root3/2)c as my speed.

Yes, that's the right answer :-p

but how did you get it? :confused:
 
I used Kinetic Energy T = E - mc^2

where E is the total particle energy and mc^2 is the rest energy. Therefore gamma is 2, and we're away with the mixer.
I just wasnt sure if this method would apply in the CM frame, but then I am not sure why it wouldnt!
Thanks for the response
 
Bigfoots mum said:
I just wasnt sure if this method would apply in the CM frame, but then I am not sure why it wouldnt!

All your favourite formulas apply in any inertial frame. :biggrin:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
87
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
963
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top