Relativistic collision and invariant s

carllacan
Messages
272
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Write the invariant s = (P1+P2)2 as a function of masses amd energies of the process

1+2 → 3+4

in the center of momentum frame and on the lab frame, in which b is at rest. Interpret the result.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


For the CoM frame I have:
s = (P1+P2)2 = (E1+E2, p1 + p2)2 = (E1+E2)2
(and similar for particles 3 and 4)

In the lab frame (primed symbols are used for variables in this frame)
s' = (P'1+P'2)2 = (E'1+E'2, p'1)2 = (E'1+E'2)2 + |p1|2 = (E'1+E'2)2 + m012-E'12 = 2E'1E'2+m012+m022
(and similar for particles 3 and 4)

Is this right? I still don't feel secure with this problems .Is if is right, can we get any interesting conclusions from the result? We must have s = s', so
2E'1E'2+m012+m022 = 2E1E2+E12+E22

And I get to E'1E'2 = E1E2 + |p1|2. If the energies were being summed I would interpret it as the fact that the energies in the lab frame is the sum of the energies in the CoM frame plus the momentum of the particles, or something like that, but this means nothing to me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
carllacan said:
In the lab frame (primed symbols are used for variables in this frame)
s' = (P'1+P'2)2 = (E'1+E'2, p'1)2 = (E'1+E'2)2 +[/color] |p1|2 = (E'1+E'2)2 + m012-E'12 = 2E'1E'2+m012+m022
I highlighted a typo (by the way: this forum supports LaTeX).

Before you interpret the result: you know E'2. What happens if you are interested in very large invariant ##\sqrt{s}##? 100 or 1000 times the masses, for example.
Compare this to a collider where b is not at rest.
 
mfb said:
I highlighted a typo (by the way: this forum supports LaTeX).

Before you interpret the result: you know E'2. What happens if you are interested in very large invariant ##\sqrt{s}##? 100 or 1000 times the masses, for example.
If s is very large compared to the masses then I guess the energy E'1 will depend mostly on E'2, but not on the masses or the mometums.
Compare this to a collider where b is not at rest.[/QUOTE]
If I repeat the calculus with particle 2 having momentum I get an expression where the momentums and the angle between them matter. Is that what you mean?
 
What is E'2 for a particle at rest? This is the first question, everything below relies on that answer.

Can anything depend on that? You can assume that particle masses are fixed.
carllacan said:
If I repeat the calculus with particle 2 having momentum I get an expression where the momentums and the angle between them matter. Is that what you mean?
No. For two particles of equal mass m, what do you need as E'1 to get ##\sqrt{s}=100m## if particle 2 is at rest?
What do you need if they collide head-on with equal energy?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top