Relativistic electric field derivation

black_hole
Messages
71
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I am supposed to derive this equation: tan(phi) = γtan(θ) by performing an integration to find the flux of E through each of 2 spherical caps; the flux through each of these caps should be equal. The first cap spans the angle θ; the element of surface area may be taken as 2∏r^2sinθdθ and the field is constant and equal to the field of a stationary point charge. The second caps spans the angle phi, the field through which is described by E = (Q/4∏εr^2)((1-β^2)(1-β^2sin^2(phi))^(3/2) and the element of surface area is 2∏r^2sin(phi)d(phi). I've tried to do this integration but can't seem to get the end result right. If it helps this is from Purcell problems 5.11.

http://books.google.com/books?id=Z3bkNh6h4WEC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've tried doing this: E for the first cap: Q/4pi*epsilon r^2 (point charge at rest) times integral of the area element given = E = (Q/4∏εr^2)((1-β^2)(1-β^2sin^2(phi))^(3/2) times the area element given for the second cap...I don't see how this will end up giving me tangent on both sides and in effect it doesn't. Is there something else I have to add?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top