Relativistic Group Velocity Calculation

neelakash
Messages
491
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



we are given that an electron and a proton have the same KE.We are to compare their phase and group velocity...


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



K=(γ₁-1)m₁c²=(γ₂-1)m₂c²
Now, I found it very problematic to extract the ratio of v₁/v₂ in terms of m₁ and m₂
So,I expanded the γ s binomially where the major contribution comes from the first few terms...It follows that group velocity if proton is much less than that of the electron...

Please tell me if I am correct and sggest any other possible ways...

Regards,
neelakash
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't use v.
Use E=T+M and p=\sqrt{T^2+2M}.
 
but how would you compae between the group velocities?

Don't use v.
Use E=T+M and p=\sqrt{T^2+2M}.

I hope your formula is pc=√[K(K+2mc²)] where K is the KE

But, p=γmv...so that you are to know γ if you want to know v
γ s are different for e and p...
 
neelakash said:
but how would you compare between the group velocities?



I hope your formula is pc=√[K(K+2mc²)] where K is the KE

But, p=γmv...so that you are to know γ if you want to know v
γ s are different for e and p...
Sorry, I should have had T=\sqrt{T^2+2MT}.
I use T for KE, which is more common, and relativistic units with c absent.
v_P=E/p, and v_g=dE/dp=p/E.
You don't need gamma or v, but they are gamma=E/M and v=p/E.
 
Buddy,what you are using seems not quite effective here...Remember we are to compare between group and phase velocities of an e and a p whose KE are the same...And you have not used the fact that their KE are the same...

I am referring to another method...It is no approximation..stands on sheer logic...

1 stands for e and 2 stands for p

K=(γ₁-1)m₁c²=(γ₂-1)m₂c²
Now,(γ₂-1)/(γ₁-1)=m₁/m₂

=>(γ₂-γ₁)/(γ₁+γ₂-2)=(m₁-m₂)/(m₁+m₂)<0
Also,(γ₁+γ₂)>2

=> γ₂<γ₁
From which you can deduce the relation between group and phase velocity...
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top