Relativistic length, 2 viewpoints

pacu
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Problem statement:

Two identical cyclists ride past each other with constant velocities Va and Vb, which are close to the speed of light. Can it be that cyclist A perceives cyclist B as shorter or longer that cyclist B perceives cyclist A ? Or simply La is NOT equal to Lb ? (La-length of cyclist A as seen by cyclist B, Lb -length of cyclist B as seen by cyclist A).

Relevant formulas:

Relative speed V = Va+Vb/(1+(Va*Vb/c^2))
Relative length l = lo * square root from 1-(V/c)^2

Conclusion:

The V from the second equation is equal for both cyclists, since addition and multiplication are alternate. lo is also equal. So there is no difference in the way cyclists A and B see each other.

Is this conclusion right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
its correct if the cyclists are the same length to begin with.

dont forget that there is also a loss of simultaneity. once you factor that in it stops seeming so impossible.
 
Last edited:

Thread 'Describing the Big Bang'

I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
View full post »
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'

Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'

See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
View full post »

Thread 'A sufficient condition for integrability of equation ##\nabla g=0##'

In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
View full post »

Similar threads

Defining which cyclist profits the most from slipstream
2
Replies
88
Views
8K
I How many meter sticks are there in this length contraction reasoning?
Replies
12
Views
2K
B Take on Length Contraction at relativistic speeds
3
Replies
115
Views
10K
B What is m in Kinetic Energy? Relativistic mass or Rest mass?
2
Replies
55
Views
5K
I Refractive index of a medium in relativistic motion
Replies
14
Views
4K
I I think the special theory of relativity self-contradicts
Replies
32
Views
2K
I Question on the energy needed to go at a relativistic speed
Replies
30
Views
2K
I Compute Length Contraction: Is ##l=1## a Possible Model?
Replies
33
Views
2K
B A thought experiment regarding special relativity
Replies
15
Views
2K
Conceptual SR question (2 cyclists)
Replies
1
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top