Relativistic scattering - determining bound on initial momentum

Afonso Campos
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A high-energy photon collides with a proton at rest. A neutral pi meson is produced according to the reaction ##\gamma + p \to p + \pi^{0}##. What is the minimum energy the photon must have for this reaction to occur? (The rest mass of a proton is ##938\ \text{MeV/c}^{2}## and the rest mass of a ##\pi^{0}## is ##135\ \text{MeV/c}^{2}##.)

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



I understand that the momentum of the photon will turn into the energy of the final-state proton and/or the muon.

I need to figure out if, for a minimum energy of the decayed photon, only the proton gets the energy of the photon or if the muon also gets a piece of the momentum of the photon.

My hunch is that only the final state proton (and not the muon) should move, because the final state proton has more rest energy than the muon, so that would translate into a smaller momentum for the final state proton and a consequently smaller energy for the photon.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Muon? There is no muon in this problem. Assuming that you mean pion.

You need to take conservation of total 4-momentum into account. The total 4-momentum should be equal before and after the interaction. Then there are certain manipulations you need to do to find the threshold energy. This should be described in your textbook (which do you use?).
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top