Relativity and Equivalence of Mass and Energy

AI Thread Summary
An electron accelerated to 99% of the speed of light has a rest mass of 9.11*10^-31 kg, and its relativistic mass can be calculated using the equation for kinetic energy. The calculated mass at this speed is approximately 6.458*10^-30 kg, which is confirmed as correct by participants in the discussion. The length of the 2-km tunnel is deemed irrelevant for the mass calculation but is relevant for determining length contraction in the electron's frame of reference. To calculate the contracted length, one should use the formula for length contraction, a fundamental concept in relativity. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately solving problems involving relativistic physics.
Alena Selone
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An electron is accelerated to a speed that is 99 percent the speed of light, and is moving through a 2-km-long tunnel. The rest mass of the electron is 9.11*10^-31 kg. What is the mass of the electron at this speed?
c= speed of light

Homework Equations


t= (tsubscript(o))/ root(1-(v^2/c^2)
L= Lsubscript(o)* root(1-0)= Lsubscript(o)
p= (mv)/ root(1-0) = mv
KE= ((mc^2)/ root(1-(v^2/c^2))-mc^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried plugging the rest mass into the last equation on the top which gives me 9.11*10^-31/ root(1-((.99c)^2/c^2
which calculates out to
9.11*10^-31/ root(1-.9801)
9.11*10^-31/root(0.0199)
9.11*10^-31/0.14106736
=6.458*10^-30

I'm unsure if this is correct. It's listed as one of the answers but I don't know if I used the correct equation, so the fact that it's listed as an answer could be a trick. I also don't know how the 2km long tunnel plays into the equation. Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks fine to me. The length of the tunnel is irrelevant. (Note that "relativistic mass" is a rather antiquated concept nowadays.)
 
Doc Al said:
Looks fine to me. The length of the tunnel is irrelevant. (Note that "relativistic mass" is a rather antiquated concept nowadays.)
So in a different equation using some of the same values, say,
An electron is accelerated to a speed that is 99 percent the speed of light, and is moving through a 2-km-long tunnel.
Could I calculate the length of the tunnel in the frame of reference of the electron or is that too irrelevant?
 
Alena Selone said:
Could I calculate the length of the tunnel in the frame of reference of the electron or is that too irrelevant?
Sure you can. For that problem, the "rest" length of the tunnel is very relevant.
 
Doc Al said:
Sure you can. For that problem, the "rest" length of the tunnel is very relevant.
So how would I do that?
 
Alena Selone said:
So how would I do that?
Look up the formula for "length contraction" (one of the key relativistic effects).
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top