Relativity and Equivalence of Mass and Energy

AI Thread Summary
An electron accelerated to 99% of the speed of light has a rest mass of 9.11*10^-31 kg, and its relativistic mass can be calculated using the equation for kinetic energy. The calculated mass at this speed is approximately 6.458*10^-30 kg, which is confirmed as correct by participants in the discussion. The length of the 2-km tunnel is deemed irrelevant for the mass calculation but is relevant for determining length contraction in the electron's frame of reference. To calculate the contracted length, one should use the formula for length contraction, a fundamental concept in relativity. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately solving problems involving relativistic physics.
Alena Selone
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An electron is accelerated to a speed that is 99 percent the speed of light, and is moving through a 2-km-long tunnel. The rest mass of the electron is 9.11*10^-31 kg. What is the mass of the electron at this speed?
c= speed of light

Homework Equations


t= (tsubscript(o))/ root(1-(v^2/c^2)
L= Lsubscript(o)* root(1-0)= Lsubscript(o)
p= (mv)/ root(1-0) = mv
KE= ((mc^2)/ root(1-(v^2/c^2))-mc^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried plugging the rest mass into the last equation on the top which gives me 9.11*10^-31/ root(1-((.99c)^2/c^2
which calculates out to
9.11*10^-31/ root(1-.9801)
9.11*10^-31/root(0.0199)
9.11*10^-31/0.14106736
=6.458*10^-30

I'm unsure if this is correct. It's listed as one of the answers but I don't know if I used the correct equation, so the fact that it's listed as an answer could be a trick. I also don't know how the 2km long tunnel plays into the equation. Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks fine to me. The length of the tunnel is irrelevant. (Note that "relativistic mass" is a rather antiquated concept nowadays.)
 
Doc Al said:
Looks fine to me. The length of the tunnel is irrelevant. (Note that "relativistic mass" is a rather antiquated concept nowadays.)
So in a different equation using some of the same values, say,
An electron is accelerated to a speed that is 99 percent the speed of light, and is moving through a 2-km-long tunnel.
Could I calculate the length of the tunnel in the frame of reference of the electron or is that too irrelevant?
 
Alena Selone said:
Could I calculate the length of the tunnel in the frame of reference of the electron or is that too irrelevant?
Sure you can. For that problem, the "rest" length of the tunnel is very relevant.
 
Doc Al said:
Sure you can. For that problem, the "rest" length of the tunnel is very relevant.
So how would I do that?
 
Alena Selone said:
So how would I do that?
Look up the formula for "length contraction" (one of the key relativistic effects).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top