Relativity: disagreement between two results

  • Thread starter Thread starter P3X-018
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relativity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a problem involving a moving bar and a particle, where two methods yield different results for the time it takes for the particle to pass the bar. The first method uses the lab's frame of reference and correctly applies the length contraction formula, resulting in T = L_0/(2vγ). The second method attempts to use time dilation from the bar's frame but fails because it does not account for the relative positions of events, leading to an incorrect application of the Lorentz transformation. The key takeaway is that observers in different inertial frames can disagree on time measurements due to the relative nature of simultaneity, emphasizing the importance of correctly applying relativistic principles. Understanding the relationship between time intervals and spatial events is crucial for resolving such discrepancies.
P3X-018
Messages
144
Reaction score
0
I have this problem, which I think I can solve in 2 ways, but only 1 of them seems to be correct, but I don't understand why the other isn't correct. The problem is as follows:

"A bar with the rest length L_0 moves in its length direction with the velocity v through a lab. A particle moves along the same line but in opposite direction with the same speed v [velocity -v]. How long will it take the particle to pass the bar, [time] mearsured from the lab."

The easy way to do this, is by saying that if L is the length of the bar seen from the lab, then the time the particle will take to pass the bar will be

T = \frac{L}{2v} = \frac{L_0}{2v\gamma}
(this is also the result given in the solutions manual)

But if we look at the situation from the bars reference frame, then the particle will be moving with a velocity

v' = \frac{2v}{1+v^2/c^2}

So the time the particle will take to pass the bar seen from the bars intertial frame will be

T' = \frac{L_0}{v'} = \frac{L_0(1+v^2/c^2)}{2v}

This time T' seen from the lab most be

T = \gamma T' = \gamma(1+v^2/c^2)\frac{L_0}{2v}

But this last result ain't equal to the first one. Why is that so? Where did I make a mistake in my last calculations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
P3X-018 said:
I have this problem, which I think I can solve in 2 ways, but only 1 of them seems to be correct, but I don't understand why the other isn't correct. The problem is as follows:

"A bar with the rest length L_0 moves in its length direction with the velocity v through a lab. A particle moves along the same line but in opposite direction with the same speed v [velocity -v]. How long will it take the particle to pass the bar, [time] mearsured from the lab."

The easy way to do this, is by saying that if L is the length of the bar seen from the lab, then the time the particle will take to pass the bar will be

T = \frac{L}{2v} = \frac{L_0}{2v\gamma}
(this is also the result given in the solutions manual)

But if we look at the situation from the bars reference frame, then the particle will be moving with a velocity

v' = \frac{2v}{1+v^2/c^2}

So the time the particle will take to pass the bar seen from the bars intertial frame will be

T' = \frac{L_0}{v'} = \frac{L_0(1+v^2/c^2)}{2v}

This time T' seen from the lab most be

T = \gamma T' = \gamma(1+v^2/c^2)\frac{L_0}{2v}

But this last result ain't equal to the first one. Why is that so? Where did I make a mistake in my last calculations?
No mistake. The observers in different inertial systems disagree on when the particle passes the bar. This is an illustration of the relative nature of simultanaeity.

AM
 
I must say this kept me stumped for a few minutes, but the solution is simple.

You used the time dilation formula to find T (T=\gamma T'), but this you may not do here.
Remember how time dilation can be derived from the Lorentz transform:
\Delta t=\gamma(\Delta t'+\frac{v}{c^2}\Delta x')
For a clock stationary in S' we have \Delta x'=0, i.e. two subsequent ticks of the clock occur at the same location in S'. However, the positions of the events also play a role in determining the time interval between the events in S.

Let's say event 1 is that the particle crosses the front of the bar and event 2 is when it crosses the back end of the bar. Then \Delta x'=-L_0 and \Delta t'=\frac{L_0}{2v}(1+v^2/c^2)

Plug that into the Lorentz transform above and you get the same answer.
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top