Relativity of simultaneity question

laurub
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
i have a question about chapter 37.2 relativity of simultaneity (pearsons international edition university physics, 12th edition) .

the text besides image b sais: inside the train, mavis moves toward the light coming from the front of the train and away from the light coming from the back of train.

then image c shows the light from the front of the train reaching her first, in my understanding, this implies mavis sees the flashes at different times because she is moving towards the origin of one of the flashes.

this is very confusing to me, because what i learned in the previous chapter tells me that cA' = cB' no matter how the train moves.

Above statement is correct right?!

if it is, then why does it look like the images are trying to tell me cA' < cB' in mavis' frame.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
laurub said:
then image c shows the light from the front of the train reaching her first, in my understanding, this implies mavis sees the flashes at different times because she is moving towards the origin of one of the flashes.
The light reaches her at different times (everyone agrees with this) and she concludes that the light flashes must have happened at different times in her frame.

this is very confusing to me, because what i learned in the previous chapter tells me that cA' = cB' no matter how the train moves.
Yes, the speed of light is the same in every frame. This is what forces her to conclude that the flashes were not simultaneous in her frame.

if it is, then why does it look like the images are trying to tell me cA' < cB' in mavis' frame.
Please explain why you think that.
 
thank you, your response led me to seeing my mistake, i focussed so much on the arrows and waves from A' and B' that i did not see the arrows and waves from A and B, and this somehow led to my mistake.

I no longer think the images are confusing.

EDIT
I got confused because A' and B' in image a are on the corners of the train, in image b they aren't, and in image c they are again on the corners of the train.
is this a printing error?
 
Last edited:
laurub said:
thank you, your response led me to seeing my mistake, i focussed so much on the arrows and waves from A' and B' that i did not see the arrows and waves from A and B, and this somehow led to my mistake.

I no longer think the images are confusing.
Good. :approve:

EDIT
I got confused because A' and B' in image a are on the corners of the train, in image b they aren't, and in image c they are again on the corners of the train.
is this a printing error?
Looks like they were a bit sloppy with the diagrams. A' and B' are the ends of the train; they should move with the train.

I see that Mavis has moved to a different seat in diagram b. More sloppiness!
 
Doc Al said:
I see that Mavis has moved to a different seat in diagram b. More sloppiness!

yes, A' and B' are incorrectly moved the same amount of distance as mavis is.
they are probably caused by the same printing error since they both only occur in diagram b.
 
laurub said:
yes, A' and B' are incorrectly moved the same amount of distance as mavis is.
they are probably caused by the same printing error since they both only occur in diagram b.
I'll bet you are right.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...

Similar threads

Back
Top