[Remember Your Squares] Something I Found

  • Thread starter Thread starter SomeGuy121
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Squares
SomeGuy121
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Let x = 1.
Let n = Next Odd Number
Let y = Previous Sum

x2 = x
+3 = 4 = (1+x)2
+5 = 9 = (3+x)2
+n = n+y = (n-2 + x)2

You could make a program to list all the squares without invoking the multiplication function or squaring function using a simple loop.

C++ Example:

#include "stdafx.h"
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;


int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[])
{
cout<<"Squares: \n\n";
int sum=1,nextOdd=1; // Sum is Starting Integer Squared, Declared X in the For Loop below

for(int x=1;x<100;x++)
{
cout<<x<<" Squared is "<<sum<<"\n";
nextOdd+=2;
sum+=nextOdd;
}
system("pause");
}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You've discovered that
\sum_{k=1}^n2k-1=n^2.
Congratulations.

Can you transform that into a formula for \sum_{k=1}^nk? Can you find one for \sum_{k=1}^nk^2?

You can check your work afterward, and even glimpse what's beyond:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/FaulhabersFormula.html
 
Are you being sarcastic with "congratulations"?
 
Thread 'Derivation of equations of stress tensor transformation'
Hello ! I derived equations of stress tensor 2D transformation. Some details: I have plane ABCD in two cases (see top on the pic) and I know tensor components for case 1 only. Only plane ABCD rotate in two cases (top of the picture) but not coordinate system. Coordinate system rotates only on the bottom of picture. I want to obtain expression that connects tensor for case 1 and tensor for case 2. My attempt: Are these equations correct? Is there more easier expression for stress tensor...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
89
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top