Resistance of New Wire: Answer the Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Magna1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resistance Wire
AI Thread Summary
The resistance of a wire originally at 5 ohms increases when it is melted down and drawn into a new wire with half the original diameter. The new wire's area becomes one-fourth of the original, while its length increases to four times that of the original wire, resulting in a resistance that is 16 times greater. Therefore, the new resistance is calculated to be 80 ohms. The discussion emphasizes the relationship between wire diameter, length, and resistance, highlighting how changes in these dimensions affect overall resistance. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving similar problems in physics.
Magna1
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I hate to ask for the answer on this one but the arguments are getting louder amongst us.


Here is the ??
A wire has a resistance of 5\Omega[\tex]. It is melted down and drwan into a new wire of \frac{1}{2}]the original diameter. What is the resistance of the new wire?<br /> <br /> Answer #1 5\Omega[\tex] because everything is proportional the amount of wire is the same just longer and not as thick.<br /> <br /> Answer #2 This is where we want to get numbers for any kind of wire and plug them into the formula R=\frac{\rho*\ell}{A}. then hopefully see something that makes sense.<br /> <br /> So our class is tomorrow and we can't settle on an answer. I hate to ask for the answer but we are out of time.<br /> <br /> I tried to Latex but not sure how it will look.<br /> I will repost if it doesn't make sense.<br /> <br /> Thank You in Advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tex didn't work

The wire is 5 ohms and we want to get it to 1/2 it's original diameter.
the formula is R=[rho)*l(length)]/Area
 
Start with the formula for resistance:

R = \frac{\rho L}{A}

The resistivity, ρ, remains constant throughout the problem (assuming you make your two measurements at the same temperature).

The volume of the wire also remains the same, so

V = A_1L_1 = A_2L_2

Given that the new diameter is half the old diameter, we know that the new area is 1/4 the old area:

A_1 = \frac{\pi d_1^2}{4}
A_2 = \frac{\pi d_2^2}{4} = \frac{\pi\left(\frac{d_1}{2}\right)^2}{4} = \frac{\pi d_1^2}{16} = \frac{A_1}{4}

And from the first equation, this means that the length of the new wire is 4 times that of the old one. Now check the resistances:

R_1 = \frac{\rho L_1}{A_1}
R_2 = \frac{\rho L_2}{A_2} = \frac{\rho (4L_1)}{\left(\frac{A_1}{4}\right)} = 16\frac{\rho L_1}{A_1} = 16*R_1

You should see that lowering the area raises the resistance. You should also see that raising the length raises the reistance. (Both of these concepts should make some intuitive sense.) In this problem, you do both so it's like a double whammy.

P.S. When you're entering LaTeX, watch the direction of your slashes.
 
Hello, can somebody please explain to me this point?
jamesrc said:
And from the first equation, this means that the length of the new wire is 4 times that of the old one. Now check the resistances:

R_1 = \frac{\rho L_1}{A_1}
R_2 = \frac{\rho L_2}{A_2} = \frac{\rho (4L_1)}{\left(\frac{A_1}{4}\right)} = 16\frac{\rho L_1}{A_1} = 16*R_1
Thank you in advance!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top