Resistance problem- combination circuit

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the total resistance of a combination circuit using Ohm's Law and series and parallel resistor formulas. Initially, an incorrect total resistance of 117 Ω was proposed, but further analysis revealed that resistors R2, R3, R4, and R5 are in series, leading to a corrected equivalent resistance calculation. The final total resistance was determined to be 57 Ω after correctly applying the series and parallel resistor rules. Participants acknowledged the clarity brought by relabeling the resistors for consistency. The conclusion confirms that the total resistance of the circuit is indeed 57 Ω.
adv
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Question 3. Find the total resistance of the following circuit.

Formulas:

R= V/I

If the # of resistors connected in series is n, the equiv. resistor is given by
Rs = R1 + R2 +... + Rn

likewise with resistors connected in parallel,
1/Rp = 1/R1 + 1/R2 +... + 1/Rn

Given:
V0 = 120 V
R1 = 20 Ω
R2 = 22 Ω
R3 = 30 Ω
R4 = 27 Ω
R5 = 40 Ω
R6 = 20 Ω
R7 = 20 Ω

My attempt:

Applying Ohm’s Law to the entire circuit:

I0 = V0 / RT , where RT is the total resistance in the circuit

But since R3 and R4 are connected in series,

RS = R3 + R4
= 30 Ω + 27 Ω
= 57 Ω

Then RT1 and R7 are connected in parallel:

1/RP = 1/RS + 1/R7
= 1/57 + 1/20
= 20/1140 + 57/1140
= 77/1140 Ω
RP = 14.8 Ω
= 15 Ω

Solve five resistors R1, R2, RP, R5 and R6. These resistors are connected in series

RT = R1 + R2 + R3 + R4 + R5 + R6
= 20 Ω + 22 Ω + 15 Ω + 40 Ω + 20 Ω
= 117 Ω

Therefore, the total resistance of the circuit is 117 Ω.

I'm not sure I took the right approach. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
R2 and R5 are in series with R3 and R4. They should be included in the calculation of RS.
 
R2, R3, R4, and R5 are all in series

R8=R2+R3+R4+R5

R8 is parrallel to R7

1/R9=1/R8 + 1/R7

R9 is in series with R1 and R6

RTotal=R1+R9+R6
 
Here is the correction:

Since R2, R3, R4 and R5 are connected in series,

R8 = R2 + R3 + R4 + R5
= 22 Ω + 30 Ω + 27 Ω + 40 Ω
= 119 Ω

Then R7 and R8 are connected in parallel:

1/R9 = 1/R7 + 1/R8
= 1/20 + 1/119
= 119/2380 + 20/2380
= 139/2380 Ω
R9 = 17.1 Ω
= 17 Ω

Solve three resistors R1, R9 and R6. These resistors are connected in series

RT = R1 + R9 + R6
= 20 Ω + 17 Ω + 20 Ω
= 57 Ω

Therefore the total resistance of the circuit is 57 Ω.

I think this is correct now. Thank you Phlogistonian and Drdizzard. BTW, the relabeling of R8 and R9 was less confusing than Rs and Rp. I guess it was more consistant. Anywho, thanks!
 
That's correct the total resistance of the circuit is 57 ohms. I am glad I was able to help.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top