Return time to its original state of a particle in the double infinite well

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that a wave function of a particle in a one-dimensional infinite double well returns to its original state after a time T=4ma²/(πħ). The approach involves analyzing a combination of the first two stationary states and factoring out the common exponential term to find the oscillation frequency. It is noted that regardless of the specific stationary states involved, the terms in the summation will yield multiples of 2π at time T. The connection to standing waves in a string illustrates that the fundamental frequency dictates the oscillation behavior of all harmonics. Ultimately, the conclusion emphasizes that the wave function's return to its original state is a general property applicable to any combination of states.
Javier141241
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


First sorry for the traduction mistakes.

Prove that any wave function of a particle in a 1 dimensional infinite double well of width a, returns to its original state in time T=4ma2/(πħ) .

Homework Equations


Ψ(x,t)=∑cnψn(x)·exp(-i·Ent/(ħ))

En=n2π2ħ2/(2ma2)

The Attempt at a Solution


I will explain my reasoning for a simpler case (combination of first two stationary states)
Ψ(x,t)=c1ψ1exp(-i·E1t/(ħ))+c2ψ2exp(-i·E2t/(ħ))
Since the global phase of Ψ doesn't matter ( |Ψ|2 ) you obtain the ω of oscillation taking common factor exp(-i·E1t/(ħ)) and obtaining ω=(E1-E2)/(ħ). Therefore for the wave function to return to the same state it was at t=0, t must be
t·(E1-E2)/(ħ)=2π
this leads to
t=4a2m/(2ħπ)·1/Q where Q its a term dependent of n

Since de statement says for any wave function and I get a similar result but depending of the Ψ in question, what I am missing? I wrote it for a combination of the two first stationary states, how would it be for a combination of n states? (since you can't take common factor the same way.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer is staring at you and you almost had it. You have
Javier141241 said:
Ψ(x,t)=∑cnψn(x)·exp(-i·Ent/(ħ))
Suppose you factor out exp(-i·E1t/ħ). What happens to the common factor exp(-i·E1t/ħ) at t = T? What happens to each term in the summation at t = T?
 
I just checked and it seems that doesn't matter which n's you take in (∑Ei)T/ħ, it just turns into multiples of 2π, diferent for each term. Should have checked it before more rigourous ( I was thinking that they couldn't all be 2π at the same time, but wasnt thinking of multiples of 2π).
Thanks for your time!
 
The wavefunctions of a particle in a box are mathematically the same as the standing waves in a string tied at both ends. The ground state (n=1) of the particle in a box corresponds to the fundamental frequency of the string. Any harmonic frequency is a multiple of the fundamental which means that in the time required for the string to complete one oscillation at the fundamental frequency, it has completed an integer number of oscillations at all harmonic frequencies.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top