Right Hand Rule - Positive or Negative Action

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on using the right-hand rule to determine positive and negative actions of forces at point B. Participants clarify how to apply the right-hand rule, emphasizing the "curled fingers" method to find the direction of the resultant vector. Confusion arises regarding the treatment of non-connected vectors and how to calculate moments when forces are applied separately. It is noted that moments can be calculated using the position vector from B to the point of application of each force. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding vector directions in relation to clockwise and anti-clockwise rotations around point B.
tornzaer
Messages
77
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://img41.imageshack.us/i/photolu.jpg/

Homework Equations



Right Hand Rule

The Attempt at a Solution



I have to find the moments at B. I know I have to use the right hand rule to figure out which force has a positive and which force has a negative action. However, I'm not too certain on how to do this. I know how to position my right hand, but I don't know whether to use the "up thumb" or "down thumb" for a specific point.

Please Help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi tornzaer! :smile:

I find the easiest way to remember the right-hand rule is that if you draw an x,y graph the usual way, then x cross y is along the usual z-axis, drawn upwards. :wink:

(Alternatively, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_hand_rule)
 
I always use the "curled fingers" version of the right hand rule. To find x cross y, I curl the fingers of my right hand from x to y--that automatically makes your thumb point in the direction of the z axis. (At least it does once you get the idea.)

Here's a site that illustrates how to use that version of the rule for just about every possible combination of vectors (some of the gifs don't work quite so well--the quicktime movies are better): http://physics.syr.edu/courses/video/RightHandRule/index2.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for the replies. What happens if vectors aren't connected like the ones on the diagram I posted. There are vectors in the same direction and different directions, but they are all separate.

Also, on question b on the diagram, it asks to find the sum of moments at B. That's what I'm confused about.
 
tornzaer said:
What happens if vectors aren't connected like the ones on the diagram I posted. There are vectors in the same direction and different directions, but they are all separate.

Not sure what you mean by "connected like the ones on the diagram" … they don't look connected to me. :confused:

If the two original directions are not perpendicular, just move your middle finger until the middle and index finger fit (if necessary, you can bend the middle finger in the middle!).

The thumb direction always remains perpendicular to the plane of the other two.

Having said that …

I never use the right-hand rule, I always use the i j k method instead. :wink:
Also, on question b on the diagram, it asks to find the sum of moments at B. That's what I'm confused about.

For each force the moment (same thing as torque :wink:) is position x force

so just draw the position vector from B to the point of application of each particular force, and proceed as before. :smile:

(and also remember that, in a 2D situation, each force will be going either clockwise or anti-clockwise round B, so you can just work out the cross-product direction of one of them, and then all the others will be either in the same direction or in the exact opposite direction, according to whether they're also clockwise or anti-clockwise. :wink:)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top