Ring of charge (half positive, half negative)

AI Thread Summary
Two half-rings of opposite charge are positioned at the origin, forming a complete ring along the y- and z-axes, with each half-ring having charge Q and radius a. The task is to derive the net electric field at point P on the +x axis, a distance d from the center. The discussion highlights the importance of analyzing the electric field components in the x, y, and z directions, noting that symmetry will cause certain components to cancel out. Specifically, only the z-direction components do not cancel, which simplifies the problem. Understanding the electric field from a single ring of charge is crucial for solving the overall electric field at point P.
jtran06
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two half-rings of charge of opposite polarity are brought together at the origin (so that the rings create a full circle against the y- and z-axis. Each half-ring has a charge of magnitude Q and radius a. Derive the net electric field at point P, located on the +x axis a distance d from the centre of the two half-rings.

Homework Equations



Not sure.


The Attempt at a Solution



I really have no idea how to work this out from what we learned in lecture; "electric field of a ring of charge".. Help, please!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As start, can you figure out the direction of the field there? Let the line of join of the semicircles be the y-axis, say. Consider separately the components of the field in the x, y and z directions. Can you see any that must cancel by symmetry?
 
I've worked it out conceptually to see that only those in the z direction do not cancel out but I'm at lost on how to retrieve that mathematically.
 
Explain to us how to find the field due to a ring of charge then — you know, what you went over in lecture. If you understand what was done there, you should be able to make a dent in this problem.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top