River channel problem using Bernoulli and Continuity

tere_lai
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] River channel problem using Bernoulli and Continuity

Homework Statement



A river (100 m wide) flows through its rectangular channel at a depth of 2.560 m at a velocity of 2.050 m/s. What is the velocity of the discharge if the channel is narrowed to 90 m?

Homework Equations



Continuity equation: Q1 = 100m x 2.560 m x 2.050 m/s
Q2 = 90 m x H2 x V2

Bernoulli equation: V^2/2g + P/pg + z = constant

The Attempt at a Solution



I can't seem to set up the equations properly in order to find intercept. I'm sure that P1 (ie. pressure1) is zero, but P2 isn't. I actually tried solving the question with P2=0 but it's wrong.

A little help?

(you may have seen this in "Introductory Physics" but I don't know how to move/delete the previous thread, sorry)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey there, in open channel flow usually the version of Bernoulli equation used is:

y + \frac{v^2}{2g} + z = constant

In your case the z value probably can be ignored assuming the river doesn't have any vertical variations in its geometry. You could use this equation which is also known as the specific energy.

y + \frac{v^2}{2g} = constant
 
The height of the water (z) is assumed to change due to the narrowing of the river channel. I think I know how to answer the question now...
 
Great!, good luck, if you have more questions feel free to ask them.
 
thanks for your help!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top