RNA-seq data analaysis: probability of making at least one type I error

AI Thread Summary
The probability of making at least one type I error in RNA-seq data analysis is calculated using the formula P=1-(1-a)^m, where m represents the number of tests and a is the probability of a type I error. To refine this calculation, m0 should be used, which denotes the number of tests where the null hypothesis is true, indicating these tests should not be rejected. The discussion clarifies that m in the original formula does not refer to the total number of tests but rather to the subset where the null hypothesis is applicable. For a more accurate formula, one must consider the proportion of tests with true null hypotheses. Understanding this distinction is crucial for correctly assessing type I error probabilities in statistical testing.
Hamsi
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
I need to derive a mathematical expression for the probability of making at least one type I error. In this expressrion i need to use the number of true null hypothesis m0.

Also the number of genes is p and the number of tests is m.
Relevant Equations
-
In general the probability of getteing at least one type I error is P=1-(1-a)^m. With m being the number of tests and a the probabiliy of getting a type I error. But i do not know how to get an expression with m0
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hamsi said:
i need to use the number of true null hypothesis .
Please explain what that means. Can you post the whole question as given to you?
 
245230
Thank you for looking at my question! This is the entire problem set. I got stuck on question D. The previous questions (a-c) are not neceassy for question D, Ithink. I would appreciate anything the can get me a step further.
 
Ok, I think I understand. They are defining m0 as the number of tests, out of all the tests conducted, for which the null hypothesis is true; i.e. these are the ones that ought not be rejected. Calling it the "number of true null hypothesis " is just poor English.
The m in the formula you quote is the same thing. It is not the total number of tests.
If you wanted a formula based on the total number of tests you would need to plug in a value for the proportion of tests in which the null hypothesis is correct.
E.g. if the null hypothesis were false in every case then the probability of a type I error in the batch would be zero.
 
  • Like
Likes Hamsi
That makes sense. Thank you very much!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Back
Top