Can Rock, Paper, Scissors Be Reinvented with New Rules?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DaveC426913
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Paper Rock
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a game where participants respond with objects that "beat" the previous object in a creative and logical manner, following specific rules. The game emphasizes imagination and requires players to respond in the format "Y [verb]'s X," where Y is the new object and X is the previous one. Key rules include no time travel, no people or actions, no fictional objects, no repeats, and a ban on hammers. Participants engage in a back-and-forth exchange, attempting to outdo each other with increasingly elaborate and humorous responses. The conversation often veers into absurdity, with players debating the validity of their responses and the interpretations of the rules. There are moments of confusion and clarification regarding what constitutes a valid response, particularly concerning the timeline of events and the nature of the objects used. The thread showcases a blend of creativity, humor, and playful competition, highlighting the challenges of maintaining the game's structure while allowing for imaginative contributions.
  • #201
ant colony eats leper colony.

(That one disgusts myself)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #202
anteater eats ant colony.
 
  • #203
mallet(hammer)[/color]beats anteater
 
  • #204
Incenerator beats mallet.
-scott
 
  • #205
The Sun beats incenerator
 
  • #206
Blair promises to aid any surviving ants, the news of the world shows video of the sun beating the incinerator.
 
Last edited:
  • #207
Scott1 beats George W. Bush in presidential elections:approve:
 
  • #208
scotts or scott2 if you read the second s backwards beats scott1.
-scott

Edit: Better yet scott_alexsk beats scott1 in posts.
 
  • #209
scott_alexsk said:
scotts or scott2 if you read the second s backwards beats scott1.
-scott

Edit: Better yet scott_alexsk beats scott1 in posts.
:confused: :confused:
I have no Idea what your talking about.

Edit:I think I have more post then you
https://www.physicsforums.com/search.php?do=finduser&u=42611
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #210
Mk beats scott_alexsk in posts.
 
  • #211
Russ_watters beats MK in post
 
  • #212
hammer beats russ waters
 
  • #213
Scerwdriver beats hammer
 
  • #214
chainsaw beats screwdriver
 
  • #215
Weilder beats chainsaw
 
  • #216
Nonmetals beat weilder.
-scott
 
  • #217
Dual-weilder beats weilder.
 
  • #218
scott_alexsk said:
Nonmetals beat weilder.
-scott
semi-conductors beats Nonmetals
 
  • #219
Hm. A little late to disqualify some things now...

Technically, post 87:
"...Tripping office worker assigned to shred Kyoto Accord results in his tie being sucked into paper shredder. Office worker gets bloody nose, strained neck, and the paper shredder is inoperable..."
violates rule b] :
"...no people or actions..."
but that was 10 pages ago!

The next one I found was post #110:
"...Basilisk outstares the paltry HEL rays..."
which violates rule c] :
"...no fictional objects or half-baked theoretical objects..."
(Ok, I'm not deliberately picking on Arildno).

If I wanted to be a strict hard-ass, I could keep yanking it back into line, but I think that might actually knock the fun out of it.

So I guess this thread continues on its slow progress towards silliness...
 
Last edited:
  • #220
Cold beats semi-conductors.
-Scott
 
  • #221
Sex beats cold.
 
  • #222
"...no fictional objects or half-baked theoretical objects..."
I think this rule should be changed to allow mythical objects and organisms.
 
  • #223
scott_alexsk said:
Cold beats semi-conductors.
-Scott
Super nova beats cold
 
  • #224
scott1 said:
Super nova beats cold
Too late; sex beats cold.
You must find something that beats sex.
 
  • #225
Being alive beats sex.
-Scott
 
  • #226
H***** beats being alive..
 
  • #227
arildno said:
H***** beats being alive..
censorship beats H*****
 
  • #228
Teens revolting against censorship coz they won't get teh göd stuff beats censorship (or atleast make the people who work with it out of a job, but that is beating i guess :D)
 
  • #229
Mattara said:
Teens revolting against censorship coz they won't get teh göd stuff beats censorship (or atleast make the people who work with it out of a job, but that is beating i guess :D)
Draft beats teens revolting


I'am scott1 and I approve this message :approve:
 
  • #230
Drought beats draft.
 
  • #231
Raining beats drought!
 
  • #232
Leidenfrost effect beats rain.
 
  • #233
The lake effect beats the Leidenfrost effect
 
  • #234
El Nino beats lake effect.

(edit: post kills fun?)
 
Last edited:
  • #235
La Niña beats El Nino
 
  • #236
Ll Transvestite beats La Niña AND El Niño!
 
  • #237
A kick in the balls beats transvestite.
 
  • #238
wearing a titanium alloy cup beats a kick in the balls
 
  • #239
Howitzer beats titanium alloy cup.
 
  • #240
thermonuclear missile beats Howitzer
 
  • #241
Missile sheild beats thermonuclear missile
 
  • #242
EMP weapon distroys missile's electronic arming and guidance systems
 
Last edited:
  • #243
Yes, but how does it beat the missile shield?
 
  • #244
EMP weapon distroys missile's shields electronics
 
  • #245
Faraday cage beats EMP.
 
  • #246
Benjamin Franklin beats the guy who inveted the Faraday cage
 
  • #247
Mortality beats Benjamin Franklin.
-scott
 
  • #248
Immortality beats mortality.
-Scott(I think I broke a rule)
 
  • #249
Benjamin Franklin beats the guy who inveted the Faraday cage
But my cage still hasn't been beaten!
 
  • #250
Thermonuclear missile beats Faraday cage.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top