Why is dm negative in the rocket equation derivation?

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion on the rocket equation derivation, the term "dm" is identified as negative because it represents mass loss from the rocket. This leads to confusion when comparing different derivation methods, as one method yields a result with a negative sign while the other does not. The key point is that both approaches can be valid if the sign conventions are clearly stated. The integration process must be handled carefully to avoid discrepancies in results. Ultimately, clarity in the derivation method is crucial, and a professor should not penalize a student for a valid approach, even if it differs in sign.
brentd49
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
I'll write the equation first, and then state my problem with it.

mv=(m+dm)(v+dv)-dm(v-v')

The book says that in the term (m+dm), that dm is a negative quantity. If I believe this, then what about the -dm(v-v') term? Why is dm negative?

If I were to derive it I would have (m-dm) and +dm(v-v'), then I wouldn't have to say "dm" is a negative quantity. But if I use this method, then my result is different by a minus sign.

Will someone please explain this in a more intuitive sense. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dm is negative because mass is being lost by the rocket. Of course, you're free to set up the momentum conservation either way. It might be helpful if in setting up your equations if you used absolute value signs around dm and write the explicit sign in front of it. You'll just have to be careful when you finally attempt to integrate the differential equation.
 
Using the textbook method their result: mdv=-v'dm

My method I get: mdv=v'dm

And if I were to integrate to find the velocity as a function of mass, I would integrate from m(t) to m. This is exactly opposite the textbook method, so I end up with the same result.

So does the differential form really matter then, if I am off by a negative? i.e. Would a professor be just in docking off points?
 
A good prof wouldn't dock you if you make it clear what you are doing and it is valid.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top