Rotating disk and its dynamical parameters

AI Thread Summary
A rotating disk with its plane perpendicular to the z-axis presents unique dynamics when a particle is sent upward along the z-axis. Key considerations include the Coriolis effect and centripetal forces, which influence the particle's trajectory in both gravitational and non-gravitational scenarios. The discussion suggests that analyzing the situation using free body diagrams could clarify the forces at play, particularly in rotating frames. It is also noted that calculations can be simplified by using an inertial frame and transforming results afterward. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurately predicting the particle's behavior in relation to the rotating disk.
James F
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey all,

I have a question that I am trying to figure out. It is more qualitative than anything, but I am concerned with the concepts that are involved in a scenario like this.

Suppose we have a rotating disk with the plane of the disk perpendicular to the z-axis. Now we send a particle upward in the z-axis direction away from the plane of the disk. What would the particle experience and effect? We should consider situations with and without gravity.

I first thought rotating frames so the Coriolis effect, but then also considered centripetal. How would the effect of gravity change either one of these component, and for that matter how would gravity change the situation at all?

Thanks for any response!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Completed masters" in what field?

Have you looked at the "free body diagrams" for the various cases?
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Bystander said:
"Completed masters" in what field?

Have you looked at the "free body diagrams" for the various cases?

For free body diagrams I have not considered them for the rotating frames, but I would assume the acceleration would take on Coriolis and centrifugal components.
 
You don't have to work in a rotating frame at all. It's possible to do everything in a standard inertial frame and then transform the results at the end. Depending on what you want to do, this might be the easiest way to go about it.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top