Rotating fluid, curl and suspended object rotation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the dynamics of a cylinder of perfectly rotating fluid characterized by a velocity field with a curl of -2k. When an infinitely light ball is placed in this fluid, the question arises regarding the ball's rotation speed. The initial assumption equates the ball's angular velocity to that of a solid object in a rotating frame, suggesting it would rotate at -1 rad/s. However, the relationship between the ball's angular velocity and the fluid's curl indicates that the ball's rotation speed should actually be half of the curl value. This leads to the conclusion that the ball's angular velocity is effectively -1, which does not match the curl of -2, highlighting a discrepancy in the initial assumptions.
luca-deltodesco
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to figure this out.

Say you have a cylinder of perfectly rotating fluid, so that it's velocity field is:
F(x,y,z) = yi - xj
which has curl -2k

assuming there is 'infinite' fluid drag and you have an 'infinitely' light ball which you place into the fluid at any point (let's say it's centre).

then how fast would the ball be rotating?

In my head I equate this to having a ball cemented into a rotating cylinder of concrete (or simply an object sat ontop of a spinning disc) and it would have an angular velocity of -1rad/s.

but at the same time, it would seem to me that the spinning object should have an angular velocity equal to the curl of the fluid at that point, and of course -1 =/= -2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
... okay nevermind:

tl;dr from wikipedia's 'intuitive interpretation' of curl:

ang. velocity of the ball is 'half' the curl >.>
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top