Rotating fluid, curl and suspended object rotation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the dynamics of a cylinder of perfectly rotating fluid characterized by a velocity field with a curl of -2k. When an infinitely light ball is placed in this fluid, the question arises regarding the ball's rotation speed. The initial assumption equates the ball's angular velocity to that of a solid object in a rotating frame, suggesting it would rotate at -1 rad/s. However, the relationship between the ball's angular velocity and the fluid's curl indicates that the ball's rotation speed should actually be half of the curl value. This leads to the conclusion that the ball's angular velocity is effectively -1, which does not match the curl of -2, highlighting a discrepancy in the initial assumptions.
luca-deltodesco
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to figure this out.

Say you have a cylinder of perfectly rotating fluid, so that it's velocity field is:
F(x,y,z) = yi - xj
which has curl -2k

assuming there is 'infinite' fluid drag and you have an 'infinitely' light ball which you place into the fluid at any point (let's say it's centre).

then how fast would the ball be rotating?

In my head I equate this to having a ball cemented into a rotating cylinder of concrete (or simply an object sat ontop of a spinning disc) and it would have an angular velocity of -1rad/s.

but at the same time, it would seem to me that the spinning object should have an angular velocity equal to the curl of the fluid at that point, and of course -1 =/= -2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
... okay nevermind:

tl;dr from wikipedia's 'intuitive interpretation' of curl:

ang. velocity of the ball is 'half' the curl >.>
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top