Rotation of a hoop about an off-center axis

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chad Jensen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Axis Rotation
AI Thread Summary
To solve the problem of a hoop rotating about an off-center axis, conservation of energy is the most effective approach. The initial potential energy of the hoop at its highest point is converted into rotational kinetic energy at the lowest point. The moment of inertia must be calculated using the Parallel-Axis Theorem, resulting in I = 2MR² for the hoop. By equating the energies and solving for angular speed, the answer is determined to be approximately 9.9 rad/s. Practicing with variables instead of numbers can help improve understanding and reduce calculation errors.
Chad Jensen
Messages
11
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


I am studying for a test and am struggling with this question on the practice exam. The answer is 9.9 I am not sure how she got to the answer though
A hoop of mass 300 g. and a radius of 20 cm rotates about an axle at the edge of a hoop. The hoop starts at highest position(pi/2) and is given a very small push. What is the angular speed when the hoop is in the lowest position(3pi/2)

Homework Equations

[/B]
I am not sure about the relevant equations. I am sure it will take the formula for I=mr2 and I am pretty sure it takes the off-center axis of rotation. Inew=Icenter mass +Md2 I am not sure the common thread they have to tie them together. Is torque also involved? If it is it would have to be an integral because the pull of gravity on the hoop varies with sin(θ) and we haven't integrated except on one exam this year, so i doubt that's the route.

The Attempt at a Solution


I knew it wasn't right but I tried the formula W2f=W2i+2αΔθ.

Edit: Here are my thoughts after looking at it again. I can find "I" and there are 3 equations given on my exam formula sheet that have "I" as a factor; Στ=Iα for torque, L=Iω for momentum and 1/2Iω2 for energy. I believe you tie everything together with the energy formula. Is that right?

Any help would be appreciated.
Thank you
Chad
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You'll want to use conservation of energy to solve this, as it's the easiest approach.
U1 + K1 + W = U2 + K2.

The initial energy is just that of the height of the center of mass (2R), m g h = (.3)(9.8)(2*.2) = 1.176J.
The ending energy is the rotational KE of the hoop about the axis, or (.5) I ω2.
To calculate I, note that the CM is not the center of the hoop, since the axis is at the rim of the hoop, so you need to use the Parallel-Axis Theorem Ip = Icm + Md2.
For a hoop, this would be I = MR2 + Md2 = MR2 + MR2 = 2MR2.
So, we have 1.176J = .5 * 2MR2ω2 = (.5)(2)(.3)(.2^2)ω2 = .012ω2.
Solving for angular speed squared, ω2, ω2 = 1.176/.012 = 98.
The square root of 98 is 9.899, or 9.9.

You can also solve this with the ending energy being the 'translational' KE of the CM of the hoop, plus the rotational KE of the hoop about the CM of the hoop.
This would be a little more complex, but you'd end up with the same answer.
 
Last edited:
Hello Chad, :welcome:

A bit of advice from an old hand, somewhat improving on Mitchel (:welcome: back, I may say :smile:):

Work with symbols as long as you can; do not start calculating unless it is necessary somehow. Check dimensions before calculating.
In this case you begin with an energy balance $${1\over 2}I\omega^2 = m\;g\;\Delta h = m\;g\; 2r $$ and you have ##I = mr^2 + mr^2## so you are left with $$\omega^2 ={ m\;g\; 2r \over mr^2 } = {2 \;g\over r} $$ which has the dimension of seconds-2, so that's OK. And less risk of typing mistakes or wrong rounding off if you calculate now.
 
  • Like
Likes Mitchel Haas
Thank you for the excellent answers. I really appreciate it. I have a hard time right now with using variables and setting up the correct formula. It is easier right now to see numbers because I know where they need to go most of the time. With variables, I have a hard time knowing what goes where. It will come with practice I am sure but it is so stressful until I get the skill developed
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top