Rotation of Rod Homework: Max Angle, Motion Analysis

  • Thread starter Thread starter rbwang1225
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rod Rotation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics homework problem involving a uniform thin rod and a bullet, analyzing the maximum angle the rod can reach after the bullet strikes it. The conservation of energy is not applicable due to the perfectly inelastic collision, where the bullet becomes part of the rod, necessitating the use of momentum or angular momentum conservation instead. The result for the maximum angle is derived using the conservation principles, leading to a specific equation involving the rod's mass and bullet's velocity. For the motion analysis, the system behaves like a pendulum undergoing simple harmonic motion (SHM) post-collision, with a need to calculate moments of inertia for detailed description. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
rbwang1225
Messages
112
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A uniform thin rod with mass M and length L nailed by frictionless pivot can swing freely on the wall as shown in Fig. The pivot locates at the distance L/4 from the bottom and stops inside. The velocity of the bullet before hitting the rod is v. (a) Compute the max. angle that the rod can reach after the shot. (b) If the swinging angle is small, describe the motion of the whole system (rod+bullet) in detail.

The Attempt at a Solution


I used the conservation of energy and concept of mass center.
The result of (a) is cos\theta = \frac{2mv^2-(M+2m)gL}{L(1+\frac{m}M)}.
I don't really understand how to get (b).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi rbwang1225! :smile:
rbwang1225 said:
I used the conservation of energy …

nooo :redface:

energy is never conserved in a collision unless the question says so :wink:

in this case, energy is obviously not conserved, since the bullet becomes part of the rod, and the collision is perfectly inelastic

however, momentum or angular momentum is always conserved in a collision :smile:

(for b, the system becomes a pendulum, with shm)
 
tiny-tim said:
hi rbwang1225! :smile:


nooo :redface:

energy is never conserved in a collision unless the question says so :wink:

in this case, energy is obviously not conserved, since the bullet becomes part of the rod, and the collision is perfectly inelastic

however, momentum or angular momentum is always conserved in a collision :smile:

(for b, the system becomes a pendulum, with shm)
Oh...right! I forgot the reason why the bullet stuck in the rod!
Now that means I have to calculate the moments of the inertia...
I know it would be a SHM but how do I describe "in detail"?
Thanks a lot!
 
rbwang1225 said:
I know it would be a SHM but how do I describe "in detail"?

τ = Iα :wink:
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top