Rotational and vibrating energy levels - find energy separation

bmarson123
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The equilibrium separation of the atoms in H35CI equals 1.27 x 10-10m. Calculate the energy separation between adjacent lines in the rotational-vibrational spectrum


Homework Equations



E = (n + 1/2)[STRIKE]h[/STRIKE]\omega + [STRIKE]h[/STRIKE]2/ 2I * l(l+1)

I = \mur02 \mu = m1m2/ m1 + m2

The Attempt at a Solution



I am assuming the above equation for E is what I need to calculate to find the energy separation.

Using the above equation for inertia, I can find a value for it, meaning I can substitute it in.

I was wondering if it was possible for me to get rid of the n+1/2 and the l(l+1) parts from each bit if I assume n = 0 and l = 0?

\omega is obviously the angular momentum, but if I want to calculate that I either need to know the frequency or the force constant, but to calculate either of these, I need the energy. So I'm very confused with what to do!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think of the selection rules and find the energy of the absorbed
photons. You can assume that all molecules are in the vibrational ground state but the rotational levels are filled even a room temperature, so there can be transitions 1→2, 2→3, 3→4, and so on.

ehild
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top