Rotational/angular problem: the bike wheel with a valve stem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the torque of a bicycle wheel with a valve stem positioned at a specific distance and angle. The initial attempt used the equation torque = rFsin(theta), but the user realized that the cross product was incorrectly applied. After clarification, it was determined that the correct approach involves using torque = rFcos(theta) to account for the angle properly. The user successfully re-evaluated their diagram and understood how to represent the force vector correctly. This led to a clearer understanding of how to calculate torque in this rotational problem.
4t0mic
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



You have your bicycle upside-down for repairs. The front wheel is free to rotate and is perfectly balanced except for the 16 g valve stem. If the valve stem is 34 cm from the rotation axis and is located 32 degrees below the horizontal, what is the resulting torque about the wheel's axis? (torque = N*m)

Homework Equations



torque = rFsin(theta)
torque = I(alpha)
torque = MR^2(alpha)

The Attempt at a Solution



So I thought that torque = rFsin(theta) would be the most relevant since I think I know the radius, force, and the theta, giving me:

torque = rFsin(theta)
torque = r(mg)sin(theta)
torque = (.34cm)(0.016kg * 9.8m/s^2)(sin32)
= 0.02825 N*m

But this is wrong. What did I do wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You did your cross product wrong.
 
Thanks for the reply. But I am using the right equation, right? So the F part in the equation is where I'm doing it wrong...
 
Ooh, so I took a break for a bit and I finally understand what you mean about the cross product. It all makes sense. I just had to redraw my diagram and draw the Force (mg) from the wheel but then draw the tangent line to the wheel where the Force is coming from. So it's torque = rFcos(theta).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top