Rotational Dynamics involving a pulley, spring, and block

JennV
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A block of mass m = 9.00 kg is situated on an incline of angle θ = 51.0^{\circ} with coefficient of kinetic friction \mu_k = 0.200, and is connected to a light spring of spring constant k = 40.0 N/m via a light rope passing over a massive pulley as shown. The block is released from rest when the spring is unstretched. The uniform solid cylindrical pulley is mounted on a frictionless axle and has the same mass as the block and a radius R = 0.550 m. The light rope which connects the spring to the block slides over the pulley without slipping.

Find the acceleration of the block at the instant it has slid a distance of x = 0.425 m parallel to the incline. (Take the positive direction to be down the incline.)

Diagram:
http://img72.imageshack.us/img72/8755/ch11qrotdyn.jpg

Homework Equations



mgsin(theta)
uk*mgcos(theta)
ma
0.5*Kx^2
Solid uniform cylinder moment of inertia = 0.5*MR^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I drew free body diagrams for each objects. & derived a equation to solve for acceleration:

m(block)gsin(theta)-ukm(block)gcos(theta)-0.5*kx^2 = 0.5m(pulley)a + m(block)a

But the acceleration that I got was really high, so I believe that it is wrong.

My question is: does the tension of the string between the spring and pulley proportional to the extension of the spring which is 0.5kx^2 ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi JennV! :smile:

(have a mu: µ and a theta: θ and try using the X2 and X2 icons just above the Reply box :wink:)
JennV said:
m(block)gsin(theta)-ukm(block)gcos(theta)-0.5*kx^2 = 0.5m(pulley)a + m(block)a

nooo …

i] the force from the spring is kx, not kx2/2 (that's the PE)

ii] the pulley isn't moving, it's only rotating, so you can't use the mass …

you either need the "effective mass" (if you know how to work that out),

or you need to call the tension either side of the pulley T1 and T2, and do two separate equations, F = ma for the block, and τ =Iα for the pulley …

what do you get? :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi JennV! :smile:

(have a mu: µ and a theta: θ and try using the X2 and X2 icons just above the Reply box :wink:)


nooo …

i] the force from the spring is kx, not kx2/2 (that's the PE)

ii] the pulley isn't moving, it's only rotating, so you can't use the mass …

you either need the "effective mass" (if you know how to work that out),

or you need to call the tension either side of the pulley T1 and T2, and do two separate equations, F = ma for the block, and τ =Iα for the pulley …

what do you get? :smile:


Thank you so much tiny-tim for replying! But I actually already have derived the answer myself and it was 3.00! YAY! =D
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top