• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products Here!

Rotational kinetic energy of falling mass

  • Thread starter kyin01
  • Start date
47
0
1. Homework Statement
1-14.png

Engineers are designing a system by which a falling mass {m} imparts kinetic energy to a rotating uniform drum to which it is attached by thin, very light wire wrapped around the rim of the drum ( View Figure ). There is no appreciable friction in the axle of the drum, and everything starts from rest.

That is top part of the problem


2. Homework Equations
mgh = rotational + translation kinetic energy


3. The Attempt at a Solution

I've tried various methods mainly using energy conservation laws, but I can't get it right. the problem didn't give I or R so ive been using .200J as the total rotational energy.

Any hits on how I should be going on this problem?

thanks
 

Answers and Replies

Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,258
618
The presentation of your problem is headache inducing. Can you maybe just include the diagram, and the problem statement and leave off the irrelevent blank graphic parts. Just type out what the question is. You also left out any description of how you attempted to use those conservation laws. There is a relation between the velocity of the descending weight and the rotational velocity of the disk. v=omega*r. Did you use that? No way to know, is there?
 
Last edited:
47
0
that was all that's given in the problem. The question is under Part A.
 
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,258
618
You don't need I or R. The question is to compare the operation of the thing on earth and on Mars. The only difference is 'g'. If you don't know something leave it as a letter. Now, write down one of these conservation laws.
 
47
0
In this situation there are no non conservative forces so

Kinetic energy = potential energy.

So in our situation we have
(Point 1 to be taken at before the system is released and point 2 to be taken just before it hits the ground)

mgh= .200 (which is the rotational kinetic energy that was given to us)

so in mars, just replace 9.8 with the given 3.71 (mass is the same) and solve for h. But when I tried that, they told me it's wrong.
I got h to be .003594m
 
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,258
618
Absolutely right. But how did you get that silly answer? If m*(9.8m/s^2)*h_earth=m*(3.7m/s^2)*h_mars, then h_mars must be LARGER than h_earth. Can you post the details of how you did it?
 
47
0
ah, I got it. Forgot to take account linear kinetic energy also

so the system is actually

Potential energy = Kinetic rotational + kinetic linear

thanks.
 

Related Threads for: Rotational kinetic energy of falling mass

  • Last Post
Replies
14
Views
910
Replies
10
Views
416
Replies
12
Views
105
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
9K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
693
Top