Rotational Kinetic Energy Question (Regarding the Earth)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the kinetic energy of the Earth as it orbits the Sun. The initial attempt used the rotational kinetic energy formula, yielding a result around 10^29 Joules, which is significantly lower than the expected value of around 10^33 Joules. It was clarified that the question specifically asks for the kinetic energy of the Earth in its orbit, not its rotation. The translational kinetic energy of the Earth in orbit is much greater than its rotational kinetic energy, suggesting that the latter can often be neglected in such calculations. Understanding the distinction between rotational and translational kinetic energy is crucial for accurate results.
zmoose27
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What is the Kinetic Energy of the Earth Orbiting Around the Sun in Joules?

Homework Equations



E rotation = (1/2)* I * w^2

where I = moment of Inertia
where w = angular velocity

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, this is my predicament: I don't know whether my professor wants me to use the above equation or not, but I don't know any other way to solve it. My answer is comes out to somewhere around 10^29, while his is around 10^33. So obviously something must be wrong...

My solution:
Earth's period = 23.93 hours
Therefore, its angular velocity is 7.29×10^ -5 rad·s-1.
Assuming that the Earth is perfectly spherical and uniform in mass density, it has a moment of inertia, I = 9.72×10^37 kg·m2.
Therefore, it has a rotational kinetic energy of 2.58×10^29 J.

Is this right? Or am I missing something completely?

Thanks a lot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You found the rotational KE of the Earth revolving on its axis. But you were asked to find:
zmoose27 said:
What is the Kinetic Energy of the Earth Orbiting Around the Sun in Joules?
 
And if you think about it, it makes sense that the Earth's translational kinetic energy is several orders of magnitude greater than its rotational. In fact, if you were only solving the net kinetic energy of the Earth to a couple decimal places, you could neglect the rotational kinetic energy entirely.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top